Literature DB >> 8730072

Vibrotactile threshold in young and old observers: the effects of spatial summation and the presence of a rigid surround.

A K Goble1, A A Collins, R W Cholewiak.   

Abstract

Human psychophysical detection thresholds for ten frequencies of sinusoidal vibration ranging from 10 to 400 Hz were obtained on the left index fingertip and thenar eminence of young and older observers using a three-alternative forced-choice tracking procedure. The first experiment utilized a 7-mm (0.38 cm2) contactor and rigid surround with 1-mm gap. In the second experiment, three contactor sizes (1.6-, 7.0-, and 25.4-mm diameter) and two surround configurations (1-mm gap between contactor and surround, and no surround) were used. The results indicate that, although the shapes of the threshold versus frequency functions were similar in the two age groups, there was a reduction in sensitivity for the older group at all frequencies. Furthermore, taking into account the difference in sensitivity between the two age groups, spatial summation and the effects of a surround did not seem to differ between the two groups. These results are discussed in the context of physiological models of cutaneous sensitivity and changes in receptor function with age.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8730072     DOI: 10.1121/1.415413

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am        ISSN: 0001-4966            Impact factor:   1.840


  11 in total

1.  Sensory function: insights from Wave 2 of the National Social Life, Health, and Aging Project.

Authors:  Jayant M Pinto; David W Kern; Kristen E Wroblewski; Rachel C Chen; L Philip Schumm; Martha K McClintock
Journal:  J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 4.077

2.  Normative vibrotactile thresholds measured at five European test centres.

Authors:  Christopher J Lindsell; Michael J Griffin
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2003-06-25       Impact factor: 3.015

Review 3.  Effects of ageing on touch.

Authors:  M M Wickremaratchi; J G Llewelyn
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 2.401

4.  Vibrotactile amplitude discrimination capacity parallels magnitude changes in somatosensory cortex and follows Weber's Law.

Authors:  E Francisco; V Tannan; Z Zhang; J Holden; M Tommerdahl
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-24       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Application of vibrotactile feedback of body motion to improve rehabilitation in individuals with imbalance.

Authors:  Conrad Wall
Journal:  J Neurol Phys Ther       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 3.649

6.  Vibrotactile masking experiments reveal accelerated somatosensory processing in congenitally blind braille readers.

Authors:  Arindam Bhattacharjee; Amanda J Ye; Joy A Lisak; Maria G Vargas; Daniel Goldreich
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2010-10-27       Impact factor: 6.167

7.  A two alternative forced choice method for assessing vibrotactile discrimination thresholds in the lower limb.

Authors:  Riccardo Iandolo; Marta Carè; Valay A Shah; Simona Schiavi; Giulia Bommarito; Giacomo Boffa; Psiche Giannoni; Matilde Inglese; Leigh Ann Mrotek; Robert A Scheidt; Maura Casadio
Journal:  Somatosens Mot Res       Date:  2019-07-03       Impact factor: 1.111

8.  Controller design and consonantal contrast coding using a multi-finger tactual display.

Authors:  Ali Israr; Peter H Meckl; Charlotte M Reed; Hong Z Tan
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Effect of frequency difference on sensitivity of beats perception.

Authors:  Soo-Chul Lim; Ki-Uk Kyung; Dong-Soo Kwon
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2011-10-25       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of aging on vibration detection thresholds at various body regions.

Authors:  Meg Stuart; A Bulent Turman; Jacqueline Shaw; Natalie Walsh; Vincent Nguyen
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2003-02-25       Impact factor: 3.921

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.