Literature DB >> 8729566

Relative roles of resolution and spatial interference in foveal and peripheral vision.

K Latham1, D Whitaker.   

Abstract

The rate of change of visual performance with increasing eccentricity of fixation is known to be task dependent. In order to examine eccentricity-related changes in visual performance when a combination of two different factors influence thresholds, visual acuity in the presence of flanking elements was investigated across the visual field. Interference zones increased in extent with eccentricity at a much faster rate than did resolution thresholds. E2 values, quantifying the eccentricity-related magnification required, were 1-2 degrees for resolution and 0.1-0.2 degrees for spatial interference. E2 values for resolution in the presence of flanks depended on the proximity of the flanks and their 'weighting' in the task. From the results, the magnitude and extent of spatial interference across the visual field can be described quantitatively. Further, the results serve as an example of how observed variations in peripheral threshold gradients might be achieved as a combination of underlying factors with different E2 values.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8729566

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt        ISSN: 0275-5408            Impact factor:   3.117


  21 in total

1.  Reading speed benefits from increased vertical word spacing in normal peripheral vision.

Authors:  Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 1.973

2.  The relationship between word length and threshold character size in patients with central scotoma and eccentric fixation.

Authors:  Anouk Déruaz; Mira Goldschmidt; Christophe Mermoud; Andrew R Whatham; Avinoam B Safran
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 3.117

3.  Holistic crowding: selective interference between configural representations of faces in crowded scenes.

Authors:  Elizabeth G Louie; David W Bressler; David Whitney
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2007-11-26       Impact factor: 2.240

4.  Crowding by a repeating pattern.

Authors:  Sarah Rosen; Denis G Pelli
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.240

5.  Contour interaction under photopic and scotopic conditions.

Authors:  Lenka Musilová; František Pluhácek; Stephanie M Marten-Ellis; Harold E Bedell; John Siderov
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2018-06-01       Impact factor: 2.240

6.  How do flanking objects affect reaching and grasping behavior in participants with macular disorders?

Authors:  Shahina Pardhan; Carmen Gonzalez-Alvarez; Ahalya Subramanian; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-09-28       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Sensory factors limiting horizontal and vertical visual span for letter recognition.

Authors:  Deyue Yu; Gordon E Legge; Gunther Wagoner; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.240

8.  Contour interaction in foveal vision: a response to Siderov, Waugh, and Bedell (2013).

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Dennis M Levi
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2013-11-08       Impact factor: 1.886

9.  Factors affecting crowded acuity: eccentricity and contrast.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Jeremy M Chin; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Crowding in the S-cone pathway.

Authors:  Daniel R Coates; Susana T L Chung
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2016-04-17       Impact factor: 1.886

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.