Literature DB >> 8728529

Interinnominate motion and symmetry: comparison between gymnasts and nongymnasts.

E Barakatt1, G L Smidt, J D Dawson, S H Wei, D G Heiss.   

Abstract

Some clinical approaches to the treatment of low back pain evaluate and treat observed asymmetries of pelvic posture and motion. Scientific evidence suggests the motion available between the innominate bones is small and variable in nature. The purposes of this investigation were 1) to determine if interinnominate motion of subjects without low back pain was symmetrical in reciprocal test posture combinations, 2) to assess innominate bone symmetry in standing, and 3) to determine if a difference in the magnitude of interinnominate motion was present between a subject group which performs more frequent flexibility activities compared with a subject group representing the general population. Thirty-four subjects (eight male gymnasts, nine female gymnasts, eight male nongymnasts, and nine female nongymnasts) were evaluated in standing and three other reciprocal postures (modified standing, modified sitting, and half-kneeling). In each posture, the Metrecom Skeletal Analysis System was used to obtain coordinates for the anterior and posterior iliac spines. Projection angles were used to determine the relative positions of the right and left innominate bones. Results suggest that stand to right modified standing and stand to left modified standing oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions were symmetrical, stand to right modified sitting and stand to left modified sitting oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions were asymmetrical, and stand to right half-kneel and stand to left half-kneel oblique sagittal interinnominate composite motions' symmetrical properties were mixed depending on the group. Gymnasts as a group were found to have asymmetrically positioned innominate bones while nongymnasts as a group had symmetrically positioned innominate bones.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8728529     DOI: 10.2519/jospt.1996.23.5.309

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther        ISSN: 0190-6011            Impact factor:   4.751


  4 in total

1.  The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Makani Lew
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2009-09

2.  Authors' response to the letter to the editors by Professor M. T. Cibulka: a critical interpretation of sacroiliac joint movement studies.

Authors:  A Vleeming; M D Schuenke; B Sturesson; F H Willard
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 2.610

3.  CHANGES IN PELVIC TILT DURING THREE DIFFERENT RECIPROCAL STANCE POSITIONS IN PATIENTS WITH SACROILIAC JOINT REGIONAL PAIN.

Authors:  Michael T Cibulka; Bradley Morr; Justin Wedel; Zachary Bohr; Garrett Jones; Cory Herman; Michael J Strube
Journal:  Int J Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2019-12

4.  Test-re-test reliability and inter-rater reliability of a digital pelvic inclinometer in young, healthy males and females.

Authors:  Chris Beardsley; Tim Egerton; Brendon Skinner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.