Literature DB >> 19703666

The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature.

Robert Cooperstein1, Makani Lew.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although it is common to find assertions relating functional leg length inequality (LLI) to pelvic torsion and other states of subluxation, comments and/or data concerning anatomical LLI in this same context are uncommon. This review of the literature synthesizes the evidence on pelvic torsion in relation to anatomical LLI.
METHODS: The literature was searched using the PubMed; Manual, Alternative, and Natural Therapy Index System; Allied and Complementary Medicine Database; Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature; and Index to Chiropractic Literature databases for primary studies that related LLI, either artificially created or naturally occurring, to pelvic torsion. Extracted data included natural vs artificial LLI, method of creating or detecting LLI, subject selection, methodology for measuring pelvic torsion, and results.
RESULTS: Nine English-language studies were retrieved published 1936-2004. Seven determined the impact of artificial, transient LLI on pelvic torsion, whereas 2 studied the effect of naturally occurring LLI.
CONCLUSION: Across varying methodologies for measuring LLI and pelvic torsion, a consistent, dose-related pattern was identified in which the innominate rotates anteriorly on the side of a shorter leg and posteriorly on the side of the longer leg. This finding was contrary to the common assertion that the ilium rotates posteriorly on the side of a short leg and vice versa. Practitioners of manual medicine who derive vectors for intervention based on leg checking procedures should consider the possibility that the direction of pelvic torsion may be variable depending on whether the LLI is of anatomical or functional origin.

Year:  2009        PMID: 19703666      PMCID: PMC2732247          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcm.2009.06.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chiropr Med        ISSN: 1556-3707


  33 in total

1.  The origin and relief of common pain.

Authors:  R E Irvin
Journal:  J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.398

2.  Acute postural adaptations induced by a shoe lift in idiopathic scoliosis patients.

Authors:  K F Zabjek; M A Leroux; C Coillard; X Martinez; J Griffet; G Simard; C H Rivard
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.134

3.  The accuracy of the Palpation Meter (PALM) for measuring pelvic crest height difference and leg length discrepancy.

Authors:  Matthew R Petrone; Jennifer Guinn; Amanda Reddin; Thomas G Sutlive; Timothy W Flynn; Matthew P Garber
Journal:  J Orthop Sports Phys Ther       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 4.751

4.  Sacroiliac motion for extreme hip positions. A fresh cadaver study.

Authors:  G L Smidt; S H Wei; K McQuade; E Barakatt; T Sun; W Stanford
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 3.468

5.  Effect of simulating leg length inequality on pelvic torsion and trunk mobility.

Authors:  R S Young; P D Andrew; G S Cummings
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.840

Review 6.  Functional and structural limb length discrepancies: evaluation and treatment.

Authors:  W J Baylis; E C Rzonca
Journal:  Clin Podiatr Med Surg       Date:  1988-07       Impact factor: 1.231

7.  Movement of the human pelvis and displacement of related anatomical landmarks on the body surface.

Authors:  B Drerup; E Hierholzer
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1987       Impact factor: 2.712

8.  Changes in innominate tilt after manipulation of the sacroiliac joint in patients with low back pain. An experimental study.

Authors:  M T Cibulka; A Delitto; R M Koldehoff
Journal:  Phys Ther       Date:  1988-09

9.  Does it matter which exercise? A randomized control trial of exercise for low back pain.

Authors:  Audrey Long; Ron Donelson; Tak Fung
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2004-12-01       Impact factor: 3.468

10.  Anatomic and functional leg-length inequality: a review and recommendation for clinical decision-making. Part II. The functional or unloaded leg-length asymmetry.

Authors:  Gary A Knutson
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2005-07-20
View more
  9 in total

1.  Heuristic exploration of how leg checking procedures may lead to inappropriate sacroiliac clinical interventions.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-09

2.  The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-06

3.  The relationship between pelvic torsion and anatomical leg length inequality: a review of the literature.

Authors:  D Wayne Rhodes; Phillip A Bishop
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2010-06

4.  Comparison of Supine and Prone Methods of Leg Length Inequality Assessment.

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Marc Lucente
Journal:  J Chiropr Med       Date:  2017-03-18

5.  Leg length discrepancy and osteoarthritis in the knee, hip and lumbar spine.

Authors:  Kelvin J Murray; Michael F Azari
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2015-09

6.  Does the Gillet test assess sacroiliac motion or asymmetric one-legged stance strategies?

Authors:  Robert Cooperstein; Felisha Truong
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2018-08

7.  The effect of sacroiliac chiropractic adjustments on innominate angles.

Authors:  Malany Moodley; Melanie Craig
Journal:  Health SA       Date:  2020-11-17

8.  Leg length measures appear inaccurate in the early phase following total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Maria Anna Smolle; Stefan Franz Fischerauer; Michael Maier; Patrick Reinbacher; Jörg Friesenbichler; Paul Ruckenstuhl; Maria Grandesso; Andreas Leithner; Werner Maurer-Ertl
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Test-re-test reliability and inter-rater reliability of a digital pelvic inclinometer in young, healthy males and females.

Authors:  Chris Beardsley; Tim Egerton; Brendon Skinner
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 2.984

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.