Literature DB >> 8728492

Evaluation of soft contact lens fitting characteristics.

G Young1.   

Abstract

The assessment of soft contact lens fit by observation of the lens behavior on the eye is one of the most common procedures undertaken in contact lens practice. Nevertheless, the guidelines for doing so have been derived empirically with little or no research into the usefulness of these observations. Over 2000 evaluations of soft contact lens fit were analyzed to determine the predictive value of various indicators of contact lens fit, namely: subjective comfort, lens centration, postblink movement (PBM), version and upgaze lag, and tightness assessed by the push-up test. The receiver-operator characteristic (ROC) curves were prepared for each variable by plotting sensitivity values against false positive rates (FPRs) for various cut-off points. Sensitivity was defined as the proportion of "bad" fits correctly identified by a given variable; FPR was defined as the proportion of "good" fits incorrectly identified as bad fits. With each fitting variable, the optimum cut-off point and its corresponding sensitivity and FPR were determined from the ROC curves. Subjective comfort was found to be of little value in identifying tight fitting lenses but was of some limited value in identifying loose fitting lenses, particularly high water content (HWC) lenses. The push-up test was the most accurate single test of lens fit acceptability having a high sensitivity for both tight (92%) and loose (80%) lens fits. Assessment of PBM was a sensitive indicator of tight fitting lenses (95%), but was a poor indicator of loose fitting lenses, having a low sensitivity (51%). Assessment of version lag showed better sensitivity than upgaze lag in assessing loose fits, whereas upgaze lag showed better sensitivity for tight lens fits. Lens centration was of no predictive value in identifying tight fitting lenses but, as expected, was of some value in identifying loose fitting lenses. The results of this study enable a critical reassessment of the procedures that practitioners follow when fitting soft contact lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8728492     DOI: 10.1097/00006324-199604000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Optom Vis Sci        ISSN: 1040-5488            Impact factor:   1.973


  8 in total

1.  Quantification of ghosting produced with presbyopic contact lens correction.

Authors:  Pete S Kollbaum; BoKaye M Dietmeier; Meredith E Jansen; Martin E Rickert
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2012-07       Impact factor: 2.018

2.  Micrometer-scale contact lens movements imaged by ultrahigh-resolution optical coherence tomography.

Authors:  Lele Cui; Meixiao Shen; Michael R Wang; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-09-13       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Associations Between Lid Wiper Microvascular Responses, Lens Fit, and Comfort After One Day of Contact Lens Adaptation by Neophytes.

Authors:  Hong Jiang; Min Fang; Ross Franklin; Ava-Gaye Simms; Zohra Fadli; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  Eye Contact Lens       Date:  2022-05-17       Impact factor: 3.152

4.  Success rates in the correction of astigmatism with toric and spherical soft contact lens fittings.

Authors:  Sevda Aydin Kurna; Tomris Sengör; Murat Un; Suat Aki
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-09-07

5.  Characterization of Soft Contact Lens Fitting Using Ultra-Long Scan Depth Optical Coherence Tomography.

Authors:  Lele Cui; Ming Li; Meixiao Shen; Fan Lu; Jianhua Wang
Journal:  J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-06-01       Impact factor: 1.909

6.  Effects of Medium-Term Soft Contact Lens Fitting on Dry Eye: Analyses Using Ultra-High Resolution Optical Coherence Tomography and Digital Slit-Lamp Biomicroscopy.

Authors:  Yuzhou Wang; Zhiqiang Xu; Shuangjiao Chen; Yangyang Xu; Linzhi Wei; Fan Lu; Liang Hu
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 3.434

7.  Characterization of Biocompatible Hydrogel Lenses Using Methacrylic Acid with Neodymium Oxide Nanoparticles.

Authors:  Min-Jae Lee; Seon-Young Park; A-Young Sung
Journal:  Polymers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-14       Impact factor: 4.329

8.  Biocompatibility and Comfort during Extended Wear of Mel4 Peptide-Coated Antimicrobial Contact Lenses.

Authors:  Parthasarathi Kalaiselvan; Debarun Dutta; Nagaraju Konda; Pravin Krishna Vaddavalli; Savitri Sharma; Fiona Stapleton; Mark D P Willcox
Journal:  Antibiotics (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-03
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.