Literature DB >> 8724238

Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force.

S H Woolf1, C G DiGuiseppi, D Atkins, D B Kamerow.   

Abstract

The US Preventive Services Task Force is an expert panel established by the federal government in 1984 to develop evidence-based practice guidelines on screening tests and other preventive services. Its recommendations are published elsewhere. This article explores the lessons learned in the process of developing and disseminating the recommendations. Topics include project organization (analytic philosophy, project sponsorship, panel composition, topic selection); the review of evidence (selecting outcome measures for judging effectiveness, constructing "causal pathways," searching the literature, rating the evidence, synthesizing the results); crafting recommendations (extrapolation, assessing magnitude, balancing risks and benefits, addressing costs, dealing with insufficient data, separating science from policy); peer review; collaboration with other groups; evaluating impact on clinicians' knowledge, attitudes, and behavior; updating recommendations; and defining a research agenda. The lessons learned suggest potential refinements in the future work of the task force and other groups engaged in guideline development.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8724238     DOI: 10.1146/annurev.pu.17.050196.002455

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health        ISSN: 0163-7525            Impact factor:   21.981


  24 in total

Review 1.  The potential contribution of decision aids to screening programmes.

Authors:  V Entwistle
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  A glossary for evidence based public health.

Authors:  Lucie Rychetnik; Penelope Hawe; Elizabeth Waters; Alexandra Barratt; Michael Frommer
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 3.710

3.  Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research.

Authors:  J Doyle; E Waters; D Yach; D McQueen; A De Francisco; T Stewart; P Reddy; A M Gulmezoglu; G Galea; A Portela
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  The effect of disseminating evidence-based interventions that promote physical activity to health departments.

Authors:  Ross C Brownson; Paula Ballew; Kathrin L Brown; Michael B Elliott; Debra Haire-Joshu; Gregory W Heath; Matthew W Kreuter
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2007-08-29       Impact factor: 9.308

5.  A flow diagram to facilitate selection of interventions and research for health care.

Authors:  L Irwig; M Zwarenstein; A Zwi; I Chalmers
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 9.408

6.  A cost analysis of a pancreatic cancer screening protocol in high-risk populations.

Authors:  Elizabeth Bruenderman; Robert C G Martin
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  2015-04-24       Impact factor: 2.565

7.  Building better guidelines with BRIDGE-Wiz: development and evaluation of a software assistant to promote clarity, transparency, and implementability.

Authors:  Richard N Shiffman; George Michel; Richard M Rosenfeld; Caryn Davidson
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 8.  Clinical practice guidelines in practice and education.

Authors:  A O Berg; D Atkins; W Tierney
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Evidence-Based Diabetes Prevention and Control Programs and Policies in Local Health Departments.

Authors:  Marissa Zwald; Lindsay Elliott; Ross C Brownson; Mahree Skala
Journal:  Diabetes Educ       Date:  2015-08-21       Impact factor: 2.140

10.  Heterogeneity in cancer guidelines: should we eradicate or tolerate?

Authors:  G Pentheroudakis; R Stahel; H Hansen; N Pavlidis
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-07-28       Impact factor: 32.976

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.