Literature DB >> 15709077

Global priority setting for Cochrane systematic reviews of health promotion and public health research.

J Doyle1, E Waters, D Yach, D McQueen, A De Francisco, T Stewart, P Reddy, A M Gulmezoglu, G Galea, A Portela.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews of health promotion and public health interventions are increasingly being conducted to assist public policy decision making. Many intra-country initiatives have been established to conduct systematic reviews in their relevant public health areas. The Cochrane Collaboration, an international organisation established to conduct and publish systematic reviews of healthcare interventions, is committed to high quality reviews that are regularly updated, published electronically, and meeting the needs of the consumers. AIMS: To identify global priorities for Cochrane systematic reviews of public health topics.
METHODS: Systematic reviews of public health interventions were identified and mapped against global health risks. Global health organisations were engaged and nominated policy-urgent titles, evidence based selection criteria were applied to set priorities.
RESULTS: 26 priority systematic review titles were identified, addressing interventions such as community building activities, pre-natal and early infancy psychosocial outcomes, and improving the nutrition status of refugee and displaced populations. DISCUSSION: The 26 priority titles provide an opportunity for potential reviewers and indeed, the Cochrane Collaboration as a whole, to address the previously unmet needs of global health policy and research agencies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2005        PMID: 15709077      PMCID: PMC1733031          DOI: 10.1136/jech.2003.019547

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health        ISSN: 0143-005X            Impact factor:   3.710


  5 in total

Review 1.  Systematic reviews from astronomy to zoology: myths and misconceptions.

Authors:  M Petticrew
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2001-01-13

Review 2.  Globalisation and the prevention and control of non-communicable disease: the neglected chronic diseases of adults.

Authors:  R Beaglehole; D Yach
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2003-09-13       Impact factor: 79.321

Review 3.  On being a good listener: setting priorities for applied health services research.

Authors:  Jonathan Lomas; Naomi Fulop; Diane Gagnon; Pauline Allen
Journal:  Milbank Q       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 4.911

Review 4.  Developing evidence-based clinical practice guidelines: lessons learned by the US Preventive Services Task Force.

Authors:  S H Woolf; C G DiGuiseppi; D Atkins; D B Kamerow
Journal:  Annu Rev Public Health       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 21.981

5.  How consumers and policymakers can use systematic reviews for decision making.

Authors:  L A Bero; A R Jadad
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-07-01       Impact factor: 25.391

  5 in total
  15 in total

1.  Sharing hypotheses and ideas in public health research: contributing to the research agenda.

Authors:  Blanca Lumbreras; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.710

2.  The use of chronic disease risk factor surveillance systems for evidence-based decision-making: physical activity and nutrition as examples.

Authors:  Anne W Taylor; Stefano Campostrini; Tiffany K Gill; Patricia Carter; Eleonora Dal Grande; Michele Herriot
Journal:  Int J Public Health       Date:  2009-12-18       Impact factor: 3.380

3.  A knowledge management tool for public health: health-evidence.ca.

Authors:  Maureen Dobbins; Kara DeCorby; Paula Robeson; Heather Husson; Daiva Tirilis; Lori Greco
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2010-08-18       Impact factor: 3.295

4.  Using the needs of WHO to prioritise Cochrane reviews: The case of antipsychotic drugs.

Authors:  Marianna Purgato; Corrado Barbui; Clive E Adams
Journal:  Int J Ment Health Syst       Date:  2011-09-24

Review 5.  Missing and accounted for: gaps and areas of wealth in the public health review literature.

Authors:  Daiva Tirilis; Heather Husson; Kara DeCorby; Maureen Dobbins
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2011-10-03       Impact factor: 3.295

6.  Prioritisation of clinical research by the example of type 2 diabetes: a caregiver-survey on perceived relevance and need for evidence.

Authors:  Stefan Kamprath; Antje Timmer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 7.  Association between the perceived environment and physical activity among adults in Latin America: a systematic review.

Authors:  Carlos M Arango; Diana C Páez; Rodrigo S Reis; Ross C Brownson; Diana C Parra
Journal:  Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act       Date:  2013-10-31       Impact factor: 6.457

Review 8.  How are health research priorities set in low and middle income countries? A systematic review of published reports.

Authors:  Skye McGregor; Klara J Henderson; John M Kaldor
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-02       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 9.  Physical activity interventions in Latin America: expanding and classifying the evidence.

Authors:  Christine M Hoehner; Isabela C Ribeiro; Diana C Parra; Rodrigo S Reis; Mario R Azevedo; Adriano A Hino; Jesus Soares; Pedro C Hallal; Eduardo J Simões; Ross C Brownson
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 5.043

10.  Global Water, Sanitation and Hygiene Research Priorities and Learning Challenges under Sustainable Development Goal 6.

Authors:  Karen Setty; Alejandro Jiménez; Juliet Willetts; Mats Leifels; Jamie Bartram
Journal:  Dev Policy Rev       Date:  2019-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.