Literature DB >> 8723200

Gene-targeting studies of mammalian behavior: is it the mutation or the background genotype?

R Gerlai1.   

Abstract

Gene targeting to create null mutations in mice is a powerful new tool in biology which will allow the molecular dissection of complex phenotypes such as mammalian brain function, and learning and memory. However, the attempt to interpret the phenotypical changes which arise in null-mutant mice is subject to several caveats. For example, the ability to disrupt a single gene in a targeted manner might lead one to overlook the effects of other genes. Ignoring the genetic background might lead to misinterpretation of results: the present article will demonstrate that the phenotypical abnormalities attributed to the null mutation in several molecular neurobiological studies could simply result from the effects of background genes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8723200     DOI: 10.1016/s0166-2236(96)20020-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Trends Neurosci        ISSN: 0166-2236            Impact factor:   13.837


  207 in total

1.  Statistical parameters in behavioral tasks and implications for sample size of C57BL/6J:129S6/SvEvTac mixed strain mice.

Authors:  S J Estill; K Fay; J A Garcia
Journal:  Transgenic Res       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 2.788

2.  Enhancement of D1 dopamine receptor-mediated locomotor stimulation in M(4) muscarinic acetylcholine receptor knockout mice.

Authors:  J Gomeza; L Zhang; E Kostenis; C Felder; F Bymaster; J Brodkin; H Shannon; B Xia; C Deng; J Wess
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-08-31       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 3.  Unlinking tumor necrosis factor biology from the major histocompatibility complex: lessons from human genetics and animal models.

Authors:  S R Ruuls; J D Sedgwick
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 11.025

4.  Deficits in memory tasks of mice with CREB mutations depend on gene dosage.

Authors:  P Gass; D P Wolfer; D Balschun; D Rudolph; U Frey; H P Lipp; G Schütz
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  1998 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.460

5.  Regulation of learning by EphA receptors: a protein targeting study.

Authors:  R Gerlai; N Shinsky; A Shih; P Williams; J Winer; M Armanini; B Cairns; J Winslow; W Gao; H S Phillips
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Mapping of quantitative trait loci with knockout/congenic strains.

Authors:  V J Bolivar; M N Cook; L Flaherty
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 9.043

Review 7.  Precision in mouse behavior genetics.

Authors:  D Pfaff
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-05-08       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 8.  Tissue-specific targeting of the insulin receptor gene.

Authors:  Rohit N Kulkarni; Terumasa Okada
Journal:  Endocrine       Date:  2002-12       Impact factor: 3.633

9.  Strain-dependent differences in LTP and hippocampus-dependent memory in inbred mice.

Authors:  P V Nguyen; T Abel; E R Kandel; R Bourtchouladze
Journal:  Learn Mem       Date:  2000 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.460

10.  Lack of tissue glucocorticoid reactivation in 11beta -hydroxysteroid dehydrogenase type 1 knockout mice ameliorates age-related learning impairments.

Authors:  J L Yau; J Noble; C J Kenyon; C Hibberd; Y Kotelevtsev; J J Mullins; J R Seckl
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2001-03-27       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.