Literature DB >> 8722937

Comparison of vancomycin, teicoplanin, metronidazole, and fusidic acid for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea.

C Wenisch1, B Parschalk, M Hasenhündl, A M Hirschl, W Graninger.   

Abstract

We conducted a prospective, randomized study to compare the efficacy of oral fusidic acid, oral metronidazole, oral vancomycin, and oral teicoplanin for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea. Treatment resulted in clinical cure for 94% of the patients who were treated with vancomycin, 96% of those treated with teicoplanin, 93% of those treated with fusidic acid, and 94% of those treated with metronidazole. Clinical symptoms recurred in 16% of patients treated with vancomycin, 7% of those treated with teicoplanin, 28% of those treated with fusidic acid, and 16% of those treated with metronidazole. There was asymptomatic carriage of C. difficile toxin in 13% of patients treated with vancomycin, 4% of those treated with teicoplanin, 24% of those treated with fusidic acid, and 16% of those treated with metronidazole. No adverse effects related to therapy with vancomycin or teicoplanin were observed. Considering the costs of treatment, our findings suggest that metronidazole is the drug of choice for C. difficile-associated diarrhea and that glycopeptides should be reserved for patients who cannot tolerate metronidazole or who do not respond to treatment with this drug.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8722937     DOI: 10.1093/clinids/22.5.813

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Infect Dis        ISSN: 1058-4838            Impact factor:   9.079


  95 in total

Review 1.  Clinical pharmacokinetics of teicoplanin.

Authors:  A P Wilson
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 6.447

2.  Pseudomembranous Colitis Caused by C. difficile.

Authors: 
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2000-06

Review 3.  Management of infectious diarrhoea.

Authors:  A C Casburn-Jones; M J G Farthing
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 23.059

Review 4.  Drug-induced Clostridium difficile-associated disease.

Authors:  M L Job; N F Jacobs
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 5.606

5.  Frequent emergence of resistance in Clostridium difficile during treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhea with fusidic acid.

Authors:  T Norén; M Wullt; Thomas Akerlund; E Bäck; I Odenholt; L G Burman
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Can metronidazole still be used for treatment of Clostridium difficile infections?

Authors:  Haihui Huang; Carl Erik Nord
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.725

7.  Clostridium difficile: The evolving story.

Authors:  Bl Johnston; Jm Conly
Journal:  Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.471

Review 8.  Comparison of three current Clostridioides difficile infection guidelines: IDSA/SHEA, ESCMID, and ACG guidelines.

Authors:  Abrar K Thabit; Mawadah H Alsolami; Nojoud A Baghlaf; Raghad M Alsharekh; Hadeel A Almazmumi; Afrah S Alselami; Fatmah A Alsubhi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 9.  Clostridium difficile infection: management strategies for a difficult disease.

Authors:  Sahil Khanna; Darrell S Pardi
Journal:  Therap Adv Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 4.409

10.  Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea in a region of Quebec from 1991 to 2003: a changing pattern of disease severity.

Authors:  Jacques Pépin; Louis Valiquette; Marie-Eve Alary; Philippe Villemure; Annick Pelletier; Karine Forget; Karine Pépin; Daniel Chouinard
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2004-08-31       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.