Literature DB >> 16940098

Frequent emergence of resistance in Clostridium difficile during treatment of C. difficile-associated diarrhea with fusidic acid.

T Norén1, M Wullt, Thomas Akerlund, E Bäck, I Odenholt, L G Burman.   

Abstract

Samples from patients with Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea (CDAD) that were randomized to fusidic acid (n = 59) or metronidazole (n = 55) therapy for 7 days were cultured for Clostridium difficile in feces on days 1, 8 to 13, and 35 to 40. Of the patients who were culture positive only before treatment, 77% (36/47) were permanently cured (no treatment failure and no clinical recurrence), compared to 54% (22/41) of those with persistence of C. difficile at one or both follow-ups (P = 0.03). A similar association between bacterial persistence and a worse outcome of therapy was seen in both treatment groups. Resistance to fusidic acid was found in 1 of 88 pretherapy isolates available, plus in at least 1 subsequent isolate from 55% (11/20) of patients who remained culture-positive after fusidic acid therapy. In 10 of these 11 patients, the resistant follow-up isolate(s) belonged to the same PCR ribotype as the susceptible day 1 isolate, confirming frequent emergence of resistance to fusidic acid during treatment. Despite this, 5 of these 11 patients were permanently cured with fusidic acid, relative to 5 of 9 patients with susceptible C. difficile at follow-up (P = 1.0). None of the 36 PCR ribotypes of C. difficile identified was associated with any particular clinical outcome or emergence of fusidic acid resistance. In conclusion, culture positivity for C. difficile was common after both fusidic acid and metronidazole therapy and was associated with treatment failure or recurrence of CDAD. Development of resistance in C. difficile was frequent in patients given fusidic acid, but it was without apparent negative impact on therapeutic efficacy in the actual CDAD episode.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16940098      PMCID: PMC1563537          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.00019-06

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  39 in total

1.  Reduced susceptibility of Clostridium difficile to metronidazole.

Authors:  J S Brazier; W Fawley; J Freeman; M H Wilcox
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 5.790

2.  Fusidic acid resistance in Staphylococcus aureus isolates.

Authors:  Erwin M Brown; Paul Thomas
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-03-02       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  E test susceptibility testing of nosocomial Clostridium difficile isolates against metronidazole, vancomycin, fusidic acid and the novel agents moxifloxacin, gatifloxacin, and linezolid.

Authors:  M J Leroi; S Siarakas; T Gottlieb
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2002-01       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 4.  Clinical practice. Antibiotic-associated diarrhea.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2002-01-31       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Fusidic acid cream for impetigo. Fusidic acid should be used with restraint.

Authors:  Erwin M Brown; Richard Wise
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-06-08

6.  An epidemic, toxin gene-variant strain of Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  L Clifford McDonald; George E Killgore; Angela Thompson; Robert C Owens; Sophia V Kazakova; Susan P Sambol; Stuart Johnson; Dale N Gerding
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2005-12-01       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Biological cost and compensatory evolution in fusidic acid-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  I Nagaev; J Björkman; D I Andersson; D Hughes
Journal:  Mol Microbiol       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.501

8.  Antimicrobial susceptibilities and serogroups of clinical strains of Clostridium difficile isolated in France in 1991 and 1997.

Authors:  F Barbut; D Decré; B Burghoffer; D Lesage; F Delisle; V Lalande; M Delmée; V Avesani; N Sano; C Coudert; J C Petit
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Reassessment of Clostridium difficile susceptibility to metronidazole and vancomycin.

Authors:  T Peláez; L Alcalá; R Alonso; M Rodríguez-Créixems; J M García-Lechuz; E Bouza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 10.  Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  L Kyne; R J Farrell; C P Kelly
Journal:  Gastroenterol Clin North Am       Date:  2001-09       Impact factor: 3.806

View more
  13 in total

1.  MBX-500, a hybrid antibiotic with in vitro and in vivo efficacy against toxigenic Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Michelle M Butler; Dean L Shinabarger; Diane M Citron; Ciarán P Kelly; Sofya Dvoskin; George E Wright; Hanping Feng; Saul Tzipori; Terry L Bowlin
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-06-25       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Management of adult Clostridium difficile digestive contaminations: a literature review.

Authors:  Fanny Mathias; Christophe Curti; Marc Montana; Charléric Bornet; Patrice Vanelle
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2018-11-29       Impact factor: 3.267

3.  Mutations in fusA associated with posttherapy fusidic acid resistance in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  T Norén; T Akerlund; M Wullt; L G Burman; M Unemo
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-02-16       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  New antimicrobial agents for patients with Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  John G Bartlett
Journal:  Curr Infect Dis Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.725

5.  The membrane as a target for controlling hypervirulent Clostridium difficile infections.

Authors:  Xiaoqian Wu; Philip T Cherian; Richard E Lee; Julian G Hurdle
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2012-12-21       Impact factor: 5.790

Review 6.  Antibacterials Developed to Target a Single Organism: Mechanisms and Frequencies of Reduced Susceptibility to the Novel Anti-Clostridium difficile Compounds Fidaxomicin and LFF571.

Authors:  Jennifer A Leeds
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2016-02-01       Impact factor: 6.915

Review 7.  Current state of Clostridium difficile treatment options.

Authors:  Anilrudh A Venugopal; Stuart Johnson
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Emerging therapies for Clostridium difficile infection - focus on fidaxomicin.

Authors:  Fredy Chaparro-Rojas; Kathleen M Mullane
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2013-06-28       Impact factor: 4.003

Review 9.  Disruption of the Gut Microbiome: Clostridium difficile Infection and the Threat of Antibiotic Resistance.

Authors:  Priscilla A Johanesen; Kate E Mackin; Melanie L Hutton; Milena M Awad; Sarah Larcombe; Jacob M Amy; Dena Lyras
Journal:  Genes (Basel)       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 4.096

10.  CD2068 potentially mediates multidrug efflux in Clostridium difficile.

Authors:  Chawalit Ngernsombat; Suthasinee Sreesai; Phurt Harnvoravongchai; Surang Chankhamhaengdecha; Tavan Janvilisri
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.