Literature DB >> 8722899

Differences in susceptibility to the "blending illusion" among Native Hebrew and English speakers.

S Aloufy1, M Lapidot, M Myslobodskym.   

Abstract

This study was designed to explore whether native Hebrew and English speakers differ in their susceptibility to the blend illusion and in their lip-reading of words and cliché sentences. Four lip-reading tests, designed to assess recognition of syllables, words, and overlearned sentences, were administered to two groups of subjects who were matched for age, sex, and educational level. The English-speaking group showed significantly higher susceptibility to the blending illusion. The source of the effect was in the enhanced sensitivity to the auditory input in males along with reduced number of auditory biases in females. No sex differences in lip-reading of any item of the lip-reading battery was obtained in native Hebrew speakers. Subjects in both groups performed at the same level in recognizing the words and overlearned sentences. The result is attributed to the shorter Voice Onset Time values of Hebrew when native listeners would hear acoustic messages prior to discernable lip movements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8722899     DOI: 10.1006/brln.1996.0036

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Brain Lang        ISSN: 0093-934X            Impact factor:   2.381


  8 in total

1.  Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Debshila Basu Mallick; Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  The McGurk effect in the time of pandemic: Age-dependent adaptation to an environmental loss of visual speech cues.

Authors:  Kateřina Chládková; Václav Jonáš Podlipský; Natalia Nudga; Šárka Šimáčková
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2021-01-14

3.  Lipreading, processing speed, and working memory in younger and older adults.

Authors:  Julia E Feld; Mitchell S Sommers
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2009-08-28       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Sex differences in multisensory speech processing in both typically developing children and those on the autism spectrum.

Authors:  Lars A Ross; Victor A Del Bene; Sophie Molholm; Hans-Peter Frey; John J Foxe
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 4.677

5.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  A Laboratory Study of the McGurk Effect in 324 Monozygotic and Dizygotic Twins.

Authors:  Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp; John F Magnotti
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 4.677

7.  Do gender differences in audio-visual benefit and visual influence in audio-visual speech perception emerge with age?

Authors:  Magnus Alm; Dawn Behne
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2015-07-16

8.  Language Experience Changes Audiovisual Perception.

Authors:  Viorica Marian; Sayuri Hayakawa; Tuan Q Lam; Scott R Schroeder
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2018-05-11
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.