Literature DB >> 33443708

The McGurk effect in the time of pandemic: Age-dependent adaptation to an environmental loss of visual speech cues.

Kateřina Chládková1,2, Václav Jonáš Podlipský3, Natalia Nudga4, Šárka Šimáčková3.   

Abstract

Seeing a person's mouth move for [ga] while hearing [ba] often results in the perception of "da." Such audiovisual integration of speech cues, known as the McGurk effect, is stable within but variable across individuals. When the visual or auditory cues are degraded, due to signal distortion or the perceiver's sensory impairment, reliance on cues via the impoverished modality decreases. This study tested whether cue-reliance adjustments due to exposure to reduced cue availability are persistent and transfer to subsequent perception of speech with all cues fully available. A McGurk experiment was administered at the beginning and after a month of mandatory face-mask wearing (enforced in Czechia during the 2020 pandemic). Responses to audio-visually incongruent stimuli were analyzed from 292 persons (ages 16-55), representing a cross-sectional sample, and 41 students (ages 19-27), representing a longitudinal sample. The extent to which the participants relied exclusively on visual cues was affected by testing time in interaction with age. After a month of reduced access to lipreading, reliance on visual cues (present at test) somewhat lowered for younger and increased for older persons. This implies that adults adapt their speech perception faculty to an altered environmental availability of multimodal cues, and that younger adults do so more efficiently. This finding demonstrates that besides sensory impairment or signal noise, which reduce cue availability and thus affect audio-visual cue reliance, having experienced a change in environmental conditions can modulate the perceiver's (otherwise relatively stable) general bias towards different modalities during speech communication.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Audiovisual integration; Cognitive adaptation; Cue reweighting; Speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2021        PMID: 33443708     DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01852-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev        ISSN: 1069-9384


  18 in total

1.  Visual recalibration of auditory speech identification: a McGurk aftereffect.

Authors:  Paul Bertelson; Jean Vroomen; Béatrice De Gelder
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2003-11

2.  Auditory-visual speech integration by prelinguistic infants: perception of an emergent consonant in the McGurk effect.

Authors:  Denis Burnham; Barbara Dodd
Journal:  Dev Psychobiol       Date:  2004-12       Impact factor: 3.038

3.  Hearing lips and seeing voices.

Authors:  H McGurk; J MacDonald
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976 Dec 23-30       Impact factor: 49.962

4.  Differences in susceptibility to the "blending illusion" among Native Hebrew and English speakers.

Authors:  S Aloufy; M Lapidot; M Myslobodskym
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Similar frequency of the McGurk effect in large samples of native Mandarin Chinese and American English speakers.

Authors:  John F Magnotti; Debshila Basu Mallick; Guo Feng; Bin Zhou; Wen Zhou; Michael S Beauchamp
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-06-04       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Forty Years After Hearing Lips and Seeing Voices: the McGurk Effect Revisited.

Authors:  Agnès Alsius; Martin Paré; Kevin G Munhall
Journal:  Multisens Res       Date:  2018-01-01       Impact factor: 2.286

7.  Cue integration in categorical tasks: insights from audio-visual speech perception.

Authors:  Vikranth Rao Bejjanki; Meghan Clayards; David C Knill; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  What accounts for individual differences in susceptibility to the McGurk effect?

Authors:  Violet A Brown; Maryam Hedayati; Annie Zanger; Sasha Mayn; Lucia Ray; Naseem Dillman-Hasso; Julia F Strand
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Audiovisual integration in children listening to spectrally degraded speech.

Authors:  David W Maidment; Hi Jee Kang; Hannah J Stewart; Sygal Amitay
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 2.297

10.  Sensory cue-combination in the context of newly learned categories.

Authors:  Kaitlyn R Bankieris; Vikranth Rao Bejjanki; Richard N Aslin
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-09-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Considerations for the Safe Operation of Schools During the Coronavirus Pandemic.

Authors:  Ronan Lordan; Samantha Prior; Elizabeth Hennessy; Amruta Naik; Soumita Ghosh; Georgios K Paschos; Carsten Skarke; Kayla Barekat; Taylor Hollingsworth; Sydney Juska; Liudmila L Mazaleuskaya; Sarah Teegarden; Abigail L Glascock; Sean Anderson; Hu Meng; Soon-Yew Tang; Aalim Weljie; Lisa Bottalico; Emanuela Ricciotti; Perla Cherfane; Antonijo Mrcela; Gregory Grant; Kristen Poole; Natalie Mayer; Michael Waring; Laura Adang; Julie Becker; Susanne Fries; Garret A FitzGerald; Tilo Grosser
Journal:  Front Public Health       Date:  2021-12-16
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.