Literature DB >> 8720305

Cardiotoxic and drug interaction profile of the second generation antihistamines ebastine and terfenadine in an experimental animal model of torsade de pointes.

J A Hey1, M del Prado, W Kreutner, R W Egan.   

Abstract

Second generation antihistamines are widely used because of their efficacy in treating allergic disorders without significant sedative side effects. Recent clinical evidence shows that some of the early prototypes in this class, namely terfenadine and astemizole, have the potential for producing torsade de pointes, a rare form of ventricular arrhythmia that is life-threatening. Important questions have been raised as to whether this is a property shared by newer, recently-introduced second generation antihistamines. The objective of this study was to characterize and compare the ECG and cardiovascular effects of terfenadine (CAS 50679-08-8) and ebastine (CAS 90729-43-4), a new second generation antihistamine, in an experimental animal model predictive of the cardiotoxic proclivity of these agents. Also, the drug interaction effect of the antifungal drug ketoconazole (CAS 65277-42-1) was evaluated, which blocks hepatic first-pass biotransformation of ebastine and terfenadine leading to increased cardiotoxity of terfenadine in man, on the ECG effects of terfenadine and ebastine in this animal model. Terfenadine (10 mg/kg) and ebastine (50 mg/kg) were administered intravenously to anesthetized guinea pigs. Electrocardiographic (ECG) and cardiovascular parameters (blood pressure and heart rate) were measured during the course of the experiment. The ECG wave form was analyzed to determine QTc interval, PR interval, QRS interval and heart rate. In separate studies in conscious guinea pigs, the effect of oral ketoconazole (200 mg) on the ECG effects of oral terfenadine (60 mg) and ebastine (10 mg) was studied. Terfenadine (10 mg/kg) and ebastine (50 mg/kg) produced significant prolongation of the QTc interval and disruption of the ECG signal when given intravenously to anesthetized guinea pigs. The ECG effects were characterized by large amplitude, morphologically aberrant T-waves, and instances of arrhythmogenic activity. Both drugs produced pronounced bradycardia and hypotension. In conscious animals, pretreatment with oral ketoconazole significantly enhanced the QTc interval prolongation effects of terfenadine and ebastine. Oral terfenadine and ebastine, when given alone at the doses tested, were devoid of adverse QTc interval prolongation effects in the conscious guinea pig. In separate studies in conscious guinea pigs, oral loratadine (10 mg; CAS 79794-75-5) given alone or in animals pretreated with ketoconazole did not affect ECG parameters. The present studies show that terfenadine and ebastine share similar cardiotoxic properties characterized by QTc interval prolongation, bradycardia, hypotension and proarrhythmogenic activity in the anesthetized guinea pig. In addition, pretreatment with ketoconazole enhances the QTc interval effect of both drugs, most likely due to the accumulation of parent compound that occurs after blockade of hepatic metabolism by CYP3A4. In conclusion, our findings indicate that ebastine and terfenadine display similarities in their inherent potential for cardiotoxic and adverse drug interaction effects. In contrast, loratadine is devoid of adverse ECG and drug interaction effects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8720305

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arzneimittelforschung        ISSN: 0004-4172


  13 in total

Review 1.  Effects of H1 antihistamines on animal models of QTc prolongation.

Authors:  J Gras; J Llenas
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 2.  Assessing the cardiac safety of ebastine. Prologue.

Authors:  D J Roberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

Review 3.  Assessing the cardiac safety of ebastine. Epilogue.

Authors:  D J Roberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

4.  Cardiotoxicity of second-generation antihistamines.

Authors:  D J Roberts
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-06       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 5.  New insights into the second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  G M Walsh; L Annunziato; N Frossard; K Knol; S Levander; J M Nicolas; M Taglialatela; M D Tharp; J P Tillement; H Timmerman
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Computer-assisted comparison of the structural and electronic dispositions of ebastine and terfenadine.

Authors:  V Segarra; M López; H Ryder; J M Palacios; D J Roberts
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 5.606

7.  Second-generation antihistamines: a comparative review.

Authors:  J W Slater; A D Zechnich; D G Haxby
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Simultaneous assessment of the hemodynamic, cardiomechanical, and electrophysiological effects of terfenadine on the in vivo canine model.

Authors:  T Usui; A Sugiyama; Y Ishida; Y Satoh; Y Sasaki; K Hashimoto
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 2.037

9.  The role of ketoconazole in the QTc interval prolonging effects of H1-antihistamines in a guinea-pig model of arrhythmogenicity.

Authors:  J Gras; J Llenas; J M Palacios; D J Roberts
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  1996-09       Impact factor: 8.739

Review 10.  Comparative tolerability of second generation antihistamines.

Authors:  F Horak; U P Stübner
Journal:  Drug Saf       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 5.606

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.