Literature DB >> 8719024

Detecting the malingering of cognitive deficits: an update.

M E Haines1, M P Norris.   

Abstract

There has recently been a dramatic increase of empirical studies that investigate methods for detecting malingering of cognitive deficits. The present review focuses on a comparison of simulated and suspected malingerers in the malingering literature, and critiques the numerous approaches to the detection of malingering. The approaches that are reviewed include detection of floor effects, discrepancies of information, response bias, neuropsychological tests and batteries, symptom validity testing, and anomalous performance on memory tests. The latter approach has only recently been proposed by researchers and may show the most promise.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8719024     DOI: 10.1007/BF02208438

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev        ISSN: 1040-7308            Impact factor:   7.444


  38 in total

1.  The detection of faked deficits on the Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test: the effect of serial position.

Authors:  L C Bernard
Journal:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 2.813

Review 2.  The detection of malingering in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  M D Franzen; G L Iverson; L M McCracken
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.444

3.  Refining the forced-choice method for the detection of malingering.

Authors:  M Hiscock; C K Hiscock
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1989-12       Impact factor: 2.475

4.  Neuropsychological evidence of a factitious memory complaint.

Authors:  L M Binder; L Pankratz
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 2.475

5.  Assessment of malingering after mild head trauma with the Portland Digit Recognition Test.

Authors:  L M Binder
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 2.475

6.  Malingering and other validity considerations in the neuropsychological evaluation of mild head injury.

Authors:  W Trueblood; M Schmidt
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.475

7.  Digit Memory Test: unequivocal cerebral dysfunction and suspected malingering.

Authors:  G P Prigatano; K Amin
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-07       Impact factor: 2.475

8.  Simulation of brain damage: assessment and decision rules.

Authors:  O E Wasyliw; J L Cavanaugh
Journal:  Bull Am Acad Psychiatry Law       Date:  1989

9.  Detecting the faking of amnesia: performance differences between simulators and patients with memory impairment.

Authors:  G A Baker; J R Hanley; H F Jackson; S Kimmance; P Slade
Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 2.475

10.  A brief test for measuring malingering in schizophrenic individuals.

Authors:  R J Beaber; A Marston; J Michelli; M J Mills
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  1985-12       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  3 in total

Review 1.  Practical guidelines in the use of symptom validity and other psychological tests to measure malingering and symptom exaggeration in traumatic brain injury cases.

Authors:  L M Etcoff; K M Kampfer
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 7.444

2.  Cognitive complaints in patients after whiplash injury: the impact of malingering.

Authors:  B Schmand; J Lindeboom; S Schagen; R Heijt; T Koene; H L Hamburger
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1998-03       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  A comparison of the self-report patterns of analog versus real-world malingerers of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  Allyson G Harrison; Irene T Armstrong
Journal:  J Neural Transm (Vienna)       Date:  2020-11-05       Impact factor: 3.575

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.