Literature DB >> 3558748

Neuropsychological evidence of a factitious memory complaint.

L M Binder, L Pankratz.   

Abstract

The authors describe a patient who complained of a severe memory loss. Information gathered from the history, interview, and testing suggested malingering. The patient was then assessed by a strategy called Symptom Validity Testing. Her score was statistically worse than chance, which provided compelling evidence that she was faking bad.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1987        PMID: 3558748     DOI: 10.1080/01688638708405357

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Exp Neuropsychol        ISSN: 1380-3395            Impact factor:   2.475


  6 in total

Review 1.  Forensic neuropsychology: the art of practicing a science that does not yet exist.

Authors:  D Faust
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1991-09       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 2.  A methodological review of "method skeptic" reports.

Authors:  R J McCaffrey; J K Lynch
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1992-09       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 3.  The detection of malingering in neuropsychological assessment.

Authors:  M D Franzen; G L Iverson; L M McCracken
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1990-09       Impact factor: 7.444

Review 4.  Detecting the malingering of cognitive deficits: an update.

Authors:  M E Haines; M P Norris
Journal:  Neuropsychol Rev       Date:  1995-06       Impact factor: 7.444

5.  Assessment of feigned cognitive impairment in severe traumatic brain injury patients with the Forced-choice Graphics Memory Test.

Authors:  Zilong Liu; Juan Dong; Xiaohong Zhao; Xiaorui Chen; Sara M Lippa; Jerome S Caroselli; Xiang Fang
Journal:  Brain Behav       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.708

Review 6.  Effort, symptom validity testing, performance validity testing and traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Erin D Bigler
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2014-09-12       Impact factor: 2.311

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.