Literature DB >> 8714867

The biological monitoring of mercury in the Seychelles study.

E Cernichiari1, T Y Toribara, L Liang, D O Marsh, M W Berlin, G J Myers, C Cox, C F Shamlaye, O Choisy, P Davidson.   

Abstract

The concentration of total mercury in maternal hair during pregnancy was used as a measure of fetal exposure to methylmercury in a study of a fish-eating population in the Seychelles islands. A segment of scalp hair approximately 10 centimeters in length, that grew during pregnancy, was selected for measurement. Total and inorganic mercury were measured by cold vapor atomic absorption (CVAA) using the Magos reagents (Magos, 1971). For comparative purposes, total mercury was measured by X-ray Fluorescent Spectrometry (XRF) and methylmercury by gas chromatography/atomic fluorescence detection (GC/AFD) in a subset of hair samples. A limited number of fish samples were also analyzed. Extensive interlaboratory testing was conducted to ensure accuracy of the mercury measurements. Concentrations of organic mercury calculated as the difference between total and inorganic mercury as measured by CVAA agreed with those of methylmercury measured on the same samples of hair by GC/AFD. Methylmercury measured by GC/AFD and organic mercury measured by CVAA accounted for over 80% of the total mercury in hair and over 90% of the total mercury in fish muscle. To test the accuracy of recapitulation by hair sampling, hair samples were collected from mothers at the time of delivery and 6 months later. The segment corresponding to the pregnancy term was selected for measurement assuming a hair growth rate of 1.1 cm/month. Results from both samples were in close agreement. As part of both a pilot investigation followed by the main study, maternal hair samples were collected each year from 1986 to 1989 for a total of 1604 samples. The median and mean values for each year's collection fell in the range of 5.9 to 8.2 ppm and exhibited no statistically significant trend with time. The highest recorded concentration was 36 ppm. In hair samples from 654 mothers, the mean concentration of total mercury was compared with the mean concentrations in segments corresponding to each trimester, approximately 3.3 centimeters in length. A high degree of correlation was found between mean levels in each trimester versus the entire pregnancy segment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8714867

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neurotoxicology        ISSN: 0161-813X            Impact factor:   4.294


  47 in total

1.  Exposure profiles of mercury in human hair at a terai belt of North India.

Authors:  Amit Masih; Ajay Taneja; Raj Singhvi
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2015-04-03       Impact factor: 4.609

2.  Stable isotope models of sugar intake using hair, red blood cells, and plasma, but not fasting plasma glucose, predict sugar intake in a Yup'ik study population.

Authors:  Sarah H Nash; Alan R Kristal; Scarlett E Hopkins; Bert B Boyer; Diane M O'Brien
Journal:  J Nutr       Date:  2013-11-06       Impact factor: 4.798

3.  Fish consumption and prenatal methylmercury exposure: cognitive and behavioral outcomes in the main cohort at 17 years from the Seychelles child development study.

Authors:  Philip W Davidson; Deborah A Cory-Slechta; Sally W Thurston; Li-Shan Huang; Conrad F Shamlaye; Douglas Gunzler; Gene Watson; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Grazyna Zareba; Jonathan D Klein; Thomas W Clarkson; J J Strain; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2011-08-25       Impact factor: 4.294

4.  Effects of hair treatment on hair mercury-The best biomarker of methylmercury exposure?

Authors:  Miwako Dakeishi; Kunihiko Nakai; Mineshi Sakamoto; Toyoto Iwata; Keita Suzuki; Xiao-Jie Liu; Tomoko Ohno; Tomoko Kurosawa; Hiroshi Satoh; Katsuyuki Murata
Journal:  Environ Health Prev Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.674

5.  CYP3A genes and the association between prenatal methylmercury exposure and neurodevelopment.

Authors:  Sabrina Llop; Van Tran; Ferran Ballester; Fabio Barbone; Aikaterini Sofianou-Katsoulis; Jordi Sunyer; Karin Engström; Ayman Alhamdow; Tanzy M Love; Gene E Watson; Mariona Bustamante; Mario Murcia; Carmen Iñiguez; Conrad F Shamlaye; Valentina Rosolen; Marika Mariuz; Milena Horvat; Janja S Tratnik; Darja Mazej; Edwin van Wijngaarden; Philip W Davidson; Gary J Myers; Matthew D Rand; Karin Broberg
Journal:  Environ Int       Date:  2017-05-10       Impact factor: 9.621

6.  Tissue mercury concentrations and adrenocortical responses of female big brown bats (Eptesicus fuscus) near a contaminated river.

Authors:  Haruka Wada; David E Yates; David C Evers; Robert J Taylor; William A Hopkins
Journal:  Ecotoxicology       Date:  2010-07-02       Impact factor: 2.823

7.  Indicative and complementary effects of human biological indicators for heavy metal exposure assessment.

Authors:  Ruiya Xing; Yonghua Li; Biao Zhang; Hairong Li; Xiaoyong Liao
Journal:  Environ Geochem Health       Date:  2016-09-06       Impact factor: 4.609

8.  Prenatal exposure to methylmercury and LCPUFA in relation to birth weight.

Authors:  Edwin van Wijngaarden; Donald Harrington; Roni Kobrosly; Sally W Thurston; Todd O'Hara; Emeir M McSorley; Gary J Myers; Gene E Watson; Conrad F Shamlaye; J J Strain; Philip W Davidson
Journal:  Ann Epidemiol       Date:  2014-01-16       Impact factor: 3.797

Review 9.  Neuropathology associated with exposure to different concentrations and species of mercury: A review of autopsy cases and the literature.

Authors:  John L O'Donoghue; Gene E Watson; Rubell Brewer; Grazyna Zareba; Komyo Eto; Hitoshi Takahashi; Masumi Marumoto; Tanzy Love; Donald Harrington; Gary J Myers
Journal:  Neurotoxicology       Date:  2020-02-22       Impact factor: 4.294

10.  Multiple environmental chemical exposures to lead, mercury and polychlorinated biphenyls among childbearing-aged women (NHANES 1999-2004): Body burden and risk factors.

Authors:  Marcella Remer Thompson; Kim Boekelheide
Journal:  Environ Res       Date:  2012-11-16       Impact factor: 6.498

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.