Literature DB >> 8714321

Validity of DSM-IV ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined types: relationship to previous DSM diagnoses/subtype differences.

A E Morgan1, G W Hynd, C A Riccio, J Hall.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: Since 1980, three different diagnostic nomenclatures have been published regarding attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD). These changing conceptualizations and diagnostic criteria have generated considerable confusion.
OBJECTIVE: To examine the multidimensional DSM-IV ADHD criteria in relation to how children and adolescents with a previous DSM-III ADD diagnosis or a DSM-III-R ADHD diagnosis are diagnosed according to DSM-IV criteria.
METHOD: Children whose original diagnoses were according to DSM-III and DSM-III-R criteria received retrospective diagnoses according to DSM-IV criteria.
RESULTS: Predominantly inattentive (n = 30) and combined types (n = 26) were compared on their previous DSM-III and DSM-III-R diagnoses and on demographic, behavioral, cognitive, and comorbidity variables. Predominantly inattentive and combined type diagnoses corresponded with DSM-III ADD/WO and ADD/H diagnoses, respectively. The DSM-III-R ADHD diagnosis did not correspond with either DSM-IV subtype. Children with the combined type diagnosis had more externalizing codiagnoses, and their parents reported more externalizing, delinquent, and aggressive behaviors. Children with the predominantly inattentive type had more math learning disability codiagnoses.
CONCLUSION: Results support a multidimensional conceptualization of ADHD. There exists close correspondence between the DSM-III ADD/WO type and the DSM-IV predominantly inattentive type and between the DSM-III ADD/H type and the DSM-IV combined type.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8714321     DOI: 10.1097/00004583-199603000-00014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry        ISSN: 0890-8567            Impact factor:   8.829


  19 in total

Review 1.  Subtypes of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD): distinct or related disorders across measurement levels?

Authors:  Dieter Baeyens; Herbert Roeyers; Johan Vande Walle
Journal:  Child Psychiatry Hum Dev       Date:  2006

2.  Profiles of current disruptive behavior: association with recent drug consumption among adolescents.

Authors:  Carla L Storr; Veronica H Accornero; Rosa M Crum
Journal:  Addict Behav       Date:  2006-05-19       Impact factor: 3.913

3.  ADHD symptom subtypes in children with pervasive developmental disorder.

Authors:  Kenneth D Gadow; Carla J DeVincent; John Pomeroy
Journal:  J Autism Dev Disord       Date:  2006-02

4.  Agreement among teachers' behavior ratings of adolescents with a childhood history of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder.

Authors:  B S Molina; W E Pelham; J Blumenthal; E Galiszewski
Journal:  J Clin Child Psychol       Date:  1998-10

5.  Genetic associations between ADHD and dopaminergic genes (DAT1 and DRD4) VNTRs in Korean children.

Authors:  Jun Ho Hong; In Wook Hwang; Myung Ho Lim; Ho Jang Kwon; Han Jun Jin
Journal:  Genes Genomics       Date:  2018-08-11       Impact factor: 1.839

6.  Multimethod assessment of psychopathology among DSM-IV subtypes of children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: self-, parent, and teacher reports.

Authors:  D S Crystal; R Ostrander; R S Chen; G J August
Journal:  J Abnorm Child Psychol       Date:  2001-06

7.  Differences in hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis functioning among children with ADHD predominantly inattentive and combined types.

Authors:  Dirk van West; Stephan Claes; Dirk Deboutte
Journal:  Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry       Date:  2009-03-18       Impact factor: 4.785

8.  ADHD subtypes and comorbid anxiety, depression, and oppositional-defiant disorder: differences in sleep problems.

Authors:  Susan Dickerson Mayes; Susan L Calhoun; Edward O Bixler; Alexandros N Vgontzas; Fauzia Mahr; Jolene Hillwig-Garcia; Belal Elamir; Linda Edhere-Ekezie; Matthew Parvin
Journal:  J Pediatr Psychol       Date:  2008-08-01

9.  A quantitative magnetic resonance imaging analysis of the cerebellar deficit hypothesis of dyslexia.

Authors:  Michelle Y Kibby; Jill B Fancher; Rochelle Markanen; George W Hynd
Journal:  J Child Neurol       Date:  2007-12-26       Impact factor: 1.987

Review 10.  Puppets, robots, critics, and actors within a taxonomy of attention for developmental disorders.

Authors:  Maureen Dennis; Katia J Sinopoli; Jack M Fletcher; Russell Schachar
Journal:  J Int Neuropsychol Soc       Date:  2008-09       Impact factor: 2.892

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.