Literature DB >> 6738086

A statistical method for biological shape comparisons.

F L Bookstein.   

Abstract

Biological shape data combine two sorts of information: genometric location and biological homology. The link between these two is the landmark, a set of biologically corresponding points located in all the forms of a series. Analysis of shapes as configurations of landmarks proceeds most effectively by D' Arcy Thompson's (1917, 1942) method of transformations. In this tradition, shape change is not the arithmetical difference of distances, angles, and ratios measured on shapes separately; rather, it is a mensurand in its own right, the geometrical deformation taking the Cartesian coordinate space of one form onto that of another in accord with biological homology. Such a deformation may be displayed, continuously or discretely, as a symmetric tensor field of principal crosses, pairs of directions which start and finish at 90 degrees. At any point, along one of these directions the dilatation, or dimensionless rate of change of length, is largest; along the other, smallest. These are the principal dilatations. All conventional scalar descriptions of the shape change may be deduced from the tensor presentation. This article reviews the statistical description of mean biological form-changes viewed in this way, and introduces linearized significance tests for mean shape change and mean size change. The tests, which make no reference to any set of size or shape variables, are based in a convenient parametric distribution for shape changes in triangles of landmarks. On a suitable null hypothesis, the ratio of the difference of the principal dilatations of the mean deformation to the sum of their standard errors goes as square root of pi/2 approximately 0.88 times an approximate t-ratio for shape change; the sum of the deviations of those dilatations from unity, divided by the sum of their standard errors, goes as square root of 2/2 approximately 0.71 times an approximate t-ratio for size change. The difference between these two constants reflects the divergent selection bias of the pair of principal dilatations. In matched studies, the difference of the principal dilatations of the mean change, divided by the mean difference of the principal dilatations case by case, is square root of 2/pi N times an approximate X2 for shape difference. Examples are presented that test cephalometric data in three scientific contexts: comparison of groups of biological shapes observed once each; characterization of mean difference in a matched design (namely, mean growth in one group observed twice); and description of mean differences in growth between groups of shapes each observed twice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1984        PMID: 6738086     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5193(84)80104-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Theor Biol        ISSN: 0022-5193            Impact factor:   2.691


  11 in total

Review 1.  The study of morphological variation in the hominid fossil record: biology, landmarks and geometry.

Authors:  P O'Higgins
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 2.610

2.  Biometrics, biomathematics and the morphometric synthesis.

Authors:  F L Bookstein
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  1996-03       Impact factor: 1.758

3.  Fourier analysis of human soft tissue facial shape: sex differences in normal adults.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; J H Schmitz; A Miani; G Taroni
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.610

4.  A three-dimensional evaluation of human facial asymmetry.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; A Miani; G Serrao
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.610

5.  Sexual dimorphism in the human face assessed by euclidean distance matrix analysis.

Authors:  V F Ferrario; C Sforza; G Pizzini; G Vogel; A Miani
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Elastic Statistical Shape Analysis of Biological Structures with Case Studies: A Tutorial.

Authors:  Min Ho Cho; Amir Asiaee; Sebastian Kurtek
Journal:  Bull Math Biol       Date:  2019-05-08       Impact factor: 1.758

7.  Automated analysis of craniofacial morphology using magnetic resonance images.

Authors:  M Mallar Chakravarty; Rosanne Aleong; Gabriel Leonard; Michel Perron; G Bruce Pike; Louis Richer; Suzanne Veillette; Zdenka Pausova; Tomáš Paus
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-05-31       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  A novel investigation of the effect of iterations in sliding semi-landmarks for 3D human facial images.

Authors:  Azree Nazri; Olalekan Agbolade; Razali Yaakob; Abdul Azim Ghani; Yoke Kqueen Cheah
Journal:  BMC Bioinformatics       Date:  2020-05-24       Impact factor: 3.169

Review 9.  The use of the geometric morphometric method to illustrate shape difference in the skulls of different-aged horses.

Authors:  Tiziana Liuti; Padraic M Dixon
Journal:  Vet Res Commun       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 2.459

10.  Changing environmental gradients over forty years alter ecomorphological variation in Guadalupe Bass Micropterus treculii throughout a river basin.

Authors:  Jessica E Pease; Timothy B Grabowski; Allison A Pease; Preston T Bean
Journal:  Ecol Evol       Date:  2018-07-30       Impact factor: 2.912

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.