Literature DB >> 8712912

Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. Comparison of the lateral and posterior approaches.

Q Y Duh1, A E Siperstein, O H Clark, W P Schecter, J K Horn, M R Harrison, T K Hunt, L W Way.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare the lateral transabdominal and posterior retroperitoneal laparoscopic methods for performing adrenalectomy.
DESIGN: Nonrandomized.
SETTING: Hospitals affiliated with the University of California, San Francisco. PATIENTS: Thirty-six patients (15 men and 21 women), aged 5 to 78 years (mean age, 49 years), were treated for the following conditions: aldosteronoma, 18 patients; pheochromocytoma, 4 patients; Cushing syndrome, 6 patients; androgen-secreting tumor, 1 patient; nonfunctioning adenoma, 3 patients; adrenal hemorrhage, 1 patient; metastatic neoplasm, 2 patients; and myelolipoma, 1 patient.
INTERVENTIONS: Twenty-three lateral and 14 posterior laparoscopic adrenalectomies. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Success rate, operating time, complications, and length of hospital stay.
RESULTS: The tumors, which ranged in size from 1 to 13 cm (mean, 4.2 cm; median, 2.5 cm), were all successfully resected laparoscopically. All 8 tumors larger than 6 cm were resected by the lateral approach. One critically ill patient died. No patient required blood transfusions or conversion to laparotomy. Mean operating time was 3.8 hours vs 3.4 hours (median, 3.5 hours vs 3 hours) and mean hospital stay was 2.2 days vs 1.5 days (median, 2 days vs 1 day) for the lateral and posterior approaches, respectively. All patients without concomitant procedures were ready to be discharged within 48 hours.
CONCLUSIONS: Both approaches were effective and safe. We prefer the lateral approach for tumors larger than 6 cm and the posterior approach for bilateral tumors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8712912     DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1996.01430200080014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Surg        ISSN: 0004-0010


  26 in total

1.  Impact of posterior retroperitoneoscopic adrenalectomy in a tertiary care center: a paradigm shift.

Authors:  Andreas Kiriakopoulos; Konstantinos P Economopoulos; Efthimios Poulios; Dimitrios Linos
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-06-03       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  [Minimally invasive adrenal gland surgery. Transperitoneal or retroperitoneal approach?].

Authors:  M K Walz
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2012-06       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy for solitary metachronous adrenal metastasis from lung cancer: report of a case.

Authors:  Y Tsuji; M Yasuhuku; T Haryu; Y Watanabe; K Ataka; M Okada
Journal:  Surg Today       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.549

4.  Endoscopic adrenalectomy: an analysis of the transperitoneal and retroperitoneal approaches and results of a prospective follow-up study.

Authors:  I Gockel; W Kneist; A Heintz; J Beyer; T Junginger
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-03-11       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Laparoscopic adrenalectomy. A new standard of care.

Authors:  J K Jacobs; R E Goldstein; R J Geer
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Evaluation of Open and Minimally Invasive Adrenalectomy: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Patrick Heger; Pascal Probst; Felix J Hüttner; Käthe Gooßen; Tanja Proctor; Beat P Müller-Stich; Oliver Strobel; Markus W Büchler; Markus K Diener
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic adrenalectomy? A single-centre UK experience.

Authors:  Vasilis A Constantinides; Ioannis Christakis; Philip Touska; Karim Meeran; Fausto Palazzo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2013-05-25       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  [The choice between transperitoneal and retroperitoneal adrenalectomy. A prospective study].

Authors:  W Kneist; G Vetter; P Kann; C Jaursch-Hancke; A Heintz; G Hommel; T Junginger
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 0.955

9.  Transition from open to laparoscopic adrenalectomy: the need for advanced training.

Authors:  D L Maccabee; A Jones; J Domreis; C W Deveney; B C Sheppard
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-07-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 10.  Pheochromocytoma.

Authors:  M S Eigelberger; Q Y Duh
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Oncol       Date:  2001-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.