Literature DB >> 8708623

Answering clinical questions.

M L Chambliss1, J Conley.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Physicians often have unanswered clinical questions. The purpose of this study was to determine how often the answers to these questions can be found in the medical literature.
METHODS: We collected unanswered clinical questions from family physicians at the end of clinical half-days. The authors and medical librarians then used textbooks and MEDLINE to find answers to each question. We returned to the physicians one to five selected references for each question. Each physician rated these sources on how well they answered the questions and how they might influence the physician's practice.
RESULTS: One hundred three questions were gathered. Physicians asked an average of 0.5 questions per half-day. We searched for answers to 86 questions, and the physicians returned ratings for 84. Forty-five (54%) of these questions were fully or nearly fully answered by the materials returned to the physicians. Of the questions for which answers were found, MEDLINE searches accounted for 71%; textbooks, 20%; and a combination, 9%. MEDLINE searches took an average of 27 minutes, whereas textbook searches averaged 6 minutes.
CONCLUSIONS: The medical literature can provide answers to a majority of clinical questions; however, finding these answers is time-consuming and expensive. Physicians need more efficient ways to answer their clinical questions.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8708623

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Fam Pract        ISSN: 0094-3509            Impact factor:   0.493


  42 in total

1.  Medcast: evaluation of an intelligent pull technology to support the information needs of physicians.

Authors:  J G Anderson; L L Casebeer; R E Kristofco
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  1999

2.  Questioning in general practice--a tool for change.

Authors:  D A Swinglehurst; M Pierce
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.386

3.  A comparative case study of two models of a clinical informaticist service.

Authors:  Trisha Greenhalgh; Jane Hughes; Charlotte Humphrey; Stephen Rogers; Deborah Swinglehurst; Peter Martin
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2002-03-02

4.  Methods for semi-automated indexing for high precision information retrieval.

Authors:  Daniel C Berrios; Russell J Cucina; Lawrence M Fagan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 4.497

5.  A taxonomy of generic clinical questions: classification study.

Authors:  J W Ely; J A Osheroff; P N Gorman; M H Ebell; M L Chambliss; E A Pifer; P Z Stavri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2000-08-12

Review 6.  An industrial process view of information delivery to support clinical decision making: implications for systems design and process measures.

Authors:  R B Elson; J G Faughnan; D P Connelly
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1997 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.497

7.  SKOLAR MD: a model for self-directed, in-context Continuing Medical Education.

Authors:  Howard R Strasberg; Thomas C Rindfleisch; Steven Hardy
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

8.  Impact of PubMed search filters on the retrieval of evidence by physicians.

Authors:  Salimah Z Shariff; Jessica M Sontrop; R Brian Haynes; Arthur V Iansavichus; K Ann McKibbon; Nancy L Wilczynski; Matthew A Weir; Mark R Speechley; Amardeep Thind; Amit X Garg
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2012-01-16       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Rethinking information delivery: using a natural language processing application for point-of-care data discovery.

Authors:  T Elizabeth Workman; Joan M Stoddart
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2012-04

10.  Electronic resources preferred by pediatric hospitalists for clinical care.

Authors:  Jimmy B Beck; Joel S Tieder
Journal:  J Med Libr Assoc       Date:  2015-10
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.