Literature DB >> 8707165

Low-molecular-weight heparins: an overview of their pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics and metabolism in humans.

A Frydman1.   

Abstract

Low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWHs) comprise a group in the class of antithrombotic medications, a class headed by unfractionated heparin (UFH). The LMWHs, with mean molecular weights of 4.0-6.0 kD, differ in their individual manufacturing processes, the distribution of their fragment molecular weights, their in vitro potency (anti-Xa, antithrombin and anticoagulant activities) and, consequently, in their biodynamic patterns, recommended dose regimen, and efficacy/safety ratio. Their drug disposition profiles have been evaluated using two significant markers of their pharmacodynamic activity, namely anti-Xa and anti-IIa activities. Since they are mainly administered subcutaneously, then compared to UFH, they are almost completely absorbed (F > or = 90%) and, in contrast to UFH, those for which data are available in the literature exhibit linear pharmacokinetics with proportionality between anti-Xa (and anti-IIa in some cases) plasma concentration and dose, and stationary distribution volume and clearance processes when the dosage is increased. Their distribution volume is close to the blood volume, they are partially metabolized by desulphatation and depolymerization, but urinary excretion of anti-Xa activity for enoxaparin, dalteparin and nadroparin, all given at doses for prevention of venous thrombosis, is between 5 and 10% of the injected dose. However, these LMWHs differ in the extent of their non-renal clearance, resulting in different apparent elimination half-life values and relative apparent bioavailability. When considering certain at-risk situations, using doses for preventing thromboembolism, the LMWHs do not significantly cross the placenta of pregnant women and their excretion profiles are only slightly altered in severe (endogenous creatinine clearance less than 15 ml/min) renal disease patients when given at doses recommended for prevention of venous thromboembolism. Because of the differences among LMWHs, the clinical profile of a given LMWH cannot be extrapolated to another one or generalized to the whole LMWH family.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8707165     DOI: 10.1159/000217270

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Haemostasis        ISSN: 0301-0147


  34 in total

1.  Leveraging physiological data from literature into a pharmacokinetic model to support informative clinical study design in pregnant women.

Authors:  J G Coen van Hasselt; Bruce Green; Glynn A Morrish
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2012-01-13       Impact factor: 4.200

2.  Anti-Xa Levels 4 h After Subcutaneous Administration of 5,700 IU Nadroparin Strongly Correlate with Lean Body Weight in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Authors:  Jeroen Diepstraten; Christian M Hackeng; Simone van Kralingen; Jiri Zapletal; Eric P A van Dongen; René J Wiezer; Bert van Ramshorst; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2012-02-01       Impact factor: 4.129

Review 3.  Anticoagulation strategies in continuous renal replacement therapy: can the choice be evidence based?

Authors:  H M Oudemans-van Straaten; J P J Wester; A C J M de Pont; M R C Schetz
Journal:  Intensive Care Med       Date:  2006-02-02       Impact factor: 17.440

4.  Treatment of deep venous thrombosis with low molecular weight heparins.

Authors:  F Ruiz; D Berman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1998-03

Review 5.  Impact of obesity on drug metabolism and elimination in adults and children.

Authors:  Margreke J E Brill; Jeroen Diepstraten; Anne van Rongen; Simone van Kralingen; John N van den Anker; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2012-05-01       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 6.  Comparative pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics of oral direct thrombin and factor xa inhibitors in development.

Authors:  Bengt I Eriksson; Daniel J Quinlan; Jeffrey I Weitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 7.  Enoxaparin. A review of its clinical potential in the management of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  S Noble; C M Spencer
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 9.546

8.  Clinical Feasibility of Monitoring Enoxaparin Anti-Xa Concentrations: Are We Getting It Right?

Authors:  Wesley D Kufel; Robert W Seabury; William Darko; Luke A Probst; Christopher D Miller
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2017-03

9.  First trimester stroke prophylaxis in pregnant women with a history of stroke.

Authors:  Ann K Helms; Oksana Drogan; Steven J Kittner
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-02-10       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 10.  New options with dabigatran etexilate in anticoagulant therapy.

Authors:  Lars Maegdefessel; Joshua M Spin; Junya Azuma; Philip S Tsao
Journal:  Vasc Health Risk Manag       Date:  2010-05-25
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.