Literature DB >> 22302439

Anti-Xa Levels 4 h After Subcutaneous Administration of 5,700 IU Nadroparin Strongly Correlate with Lean Body Weight in Morbidly Obese Patients.

Jeroen Diepstraten1, Christian M Hackeng, Simone van Kralingen, Jiri Zapletal, Eric P A van Dongen, René J Wiezer, Bert van Ramshorst, Catherijne A J Knibbe.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Morbidly obese patients (BMI > 40 kg/m(2)) are at increased risk for venous thromboembolism, especially after surgery. Despite limited evidence, morbidly obese patients are often administered a double dose of nadroparin for thromboprophylaxis compared to non-obese patients. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of different body size descriptors on anti-Xa levels after a double dose of nadroparin (5,700 IU) in morbidly obese patients.
METHODS: In 27 morbidly obese patients with a mean total body weight of 148 kg (range 107-260 kg), anti-Xa levels were determined peri-operatively until 24 h after administration of a subcutaneous dose of 5,700 IU of nadroparin.
RESULTS: Anti-Xa level 4 h after administration (A(4h), mean 0.22 ± 0.07 IU/ml) negatively correlated strongly with lean body weight (r = -0.66 (p < 0.001)) and moderately with total body weight (r = -0.56 (p = 0.003)) and did not correlate with body mass index (r = -0.26 (p = 0.187)). The area under the anti-Xa level-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUA(0-24h), mean 2.80 ± 0.97 h IU/ml) correlated with lean body weight (r = -0.63 (p = 0.007)), but did not correlate with total body weight (r = -0.44 (p = 0.075)) or body mass index (r = -0.10 (p = 0.709)). CONCLUCIONS: Following a subcutaneous dose of nadroparin 5,700 IU, A(4h) and AUA(0-24h) were found to negatively correlate strongly with lean body weight. From these results, individualized dosing of nadroparin based on lean body weight should be considered in morbidly obese patients.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 22302439     DOI: 10.1007/s11695-012-0602-7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obes Surg        ISSN: 0960-8923            Impact factor:   4.129


  26 in total

1.  Is laboratory monitoring of low-molecular-weight heparin therapy necessary? Yes.

Authors:  J Harenberg
Journal:  J Thromb Haemost       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.824

2.  Bioavailability and antagonization of the low molecular weight heparin CY 216 in man.

Authors:  J Harenberg; B Würzner; R Zimmermann; G Schettler
Journal:  Thromb Res       Date:  1986-11-15       Impact factor: 3.944

3.  Obesity as a risk factor in venous thromboembolism.

Authors:  Paul D Stein; Afzal Beemath; Ronald E Olson
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 4.965

4.  Prevalence of overweight and obesity in the United States, 1999-2004.

Authors:  Cynthia L Ogden; Margaret D Carroll; Lester R Curtin; Margaret A McDowell; Carolyn J Tabak; Katherine M Flegal
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2006-04-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  An evaluation of the biological response to Fraxiparine, (a low molecular weight heparin) in the healthy individual.

Authors:  M D Freedman; P Leese; R Prasad; D Hayden
Journal:  J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1990-08       Impact factor: 3.126

6.  The pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of enoxaparin in obese volunteers.

Authors:  Ger-Jan Sanderink; Aimé Le Liboux; Navin Jariwala; Neasa Harding; Marie-Laure Ozoux; Umesh Shukla; Guy Montay; Bruno Boutouyrie; Adelaida Miro
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 6.875

7.  Heparin and low-molecular-weight heparin: the Seventh ACCP Conference on Antithrombotic and Thrombolytic Therapy.

Authors:  Jack Hirsh; Robert Raschke
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 9.410

8.  Combined renal effects of overweight and hypertension.

Authors:  J Ribstein; G du Cailar; A Mimran
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 10.190

9.  Prevention of venous thromboembolism: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines (8th Edition).

Authors:  William H Geerts; David Bergqvist; Graham F Pineo; John A Heit; Charles M Samama; Michael R Lassen; Clifford W Colwell
Journal:  Chest       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 9.410

10.  Comparison of the pharmacokinetic profiles of three low molecular mass heparins--dalteparin, enoxaparin and nadroparin--administered subcutaneously in healthy volunteers (doses for prevention of thromboembolism).

Authors:  F Collignon; A Frydman; H Caplain; M L Ozoux; Y Le Roux; J Bouthier; J J Thébault
Journal:  Thromb Haemost       Date:  1995-04       Impact factor: 5.249

View more
  4 in total

1.  The Effect of Obesity on Anti-Xa Concentrations in Bariatric Patients.

Authors:  W Schijns; M J Deenen; E O Aarts; J Homan; I M C Janssen; F J Berends; K A H Kaasjager
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2018-07       Impact factor: 4.129

2.  Risk of thrombosis and thromboembolic prophylaxis in obesity surgery: data analysis from the German Bariatric Surgery Registry.

Authors:  C Stroh; N Michel; D Luderer; S Wolff; V Lange; F Köckerling; C Knoll; T Manger
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2016-11       Impact factor: 4.129

3.  Population pharmacodynamic model for low molecular weight heparin nadroparin in morbidly obese and non-obese patients using anti-Xa levels as endpoint.

Authors:  Jeroen Diepstraten; Esther J H Janssen; Christian M Hackeng; Eric P A van Dongen; René J Wiezer; Bert van Ramshorst; Catherijne A J Knibbe
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-10-12       Impact factor: 2.953

4.  Fixed-dose enoxaparin after bariatric surgery: the influence of body weight on peak anti-Xa levels.

Authors:  Funda Celik; Alwin D R Huitema; Jan H Hooijberg; Arnold W J M van de Laar; Dees P M Brandjes; Victor E A Gerdes
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 4.129

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.