Literature DB >> 8706213

Technology assessment: a Canadian perspective.

R J Byrick1.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8706213     DOI: 10.1007/BF03011673

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Can J Anaesth        ISSN: 0832-610X            Impact factor:   5.063


× No keyword cloud information.
  19 in total

Review 1.  Health care technology in Canada (with special reference to Quebec).

Authors:  R N Battista; R Jacob; M J Hodge
Journal:  Health Policy       Date:  1994 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.980

Review 2.  It's time to rethink health care technology assessment.

Authors:  C Goodman
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 2.188

Review 3.  Standards of evidence for the safety and effectiveness of critical care monitoring devices and related interventions. Coalition for Critical Care Excellence: Consensus Conference on Physiologic Monitoring Devices.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

4.  The impact of technology on physician cognition and performance.

Authors:  D D Woods; R I Cook; C E Billings
Journal:  J Clin Monit       Date:  1995-01

5.  Effect of automatic record keeping on vigilance and record keeping time.

Authors:  J Allard; R Dzwonczyk; D Yablok; F E Block; J S McDonald
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 9.166

Review 6.  A model for technology assessment applied to pulse oximetry. The Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors: 
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1993-04       Impact factor: 7.598

7.  Assessing technology assessment. Early results of the Quebec experience.

Authors:  R Jacob; R N Battista
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  1993       Impact factor: 2.188

8.  Guidelines for medical technology in critical care. Technology Subcommittee of the Working Group on Critical Care, Ontario Ministry of Health.

Authors: 
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1991-06-15       Impact factor: 8.262

9.  Randomized evaluation of pulse oximetry in 20,802 patients: II. Perioperative events and postoperative complications.

Authors:  J T Moller; N W Johannessen; K Espersen; O Ravlo; B D Pedersen; P F Jensen; N H Rasmussen; L S Rasmussen; T Pedersen; J B Cooper
Journal:  Anesthesiology       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 7.892

Review 10.  A model for technology assessment as applied to closed loop infusion systems. Technology Assessment Task Force of the Society of Critical Care Medicine.

Authors:  M Jastremski; C Jastremski; M Shepherd; V Friedman; D Porembka; R Smith; E Gonzales; D Swedlow; H Belzberg; R Crass
Journal:  Crit Care Med       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 7.598

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.