Literature DB >> 8705774

Planning for coronary angioplasty: guidelines for training and continuing competence. British Cardiac Society (BCS) and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society (BCIS) working group on interventional cardiology.

D J Parker1, H H Gray, R Balcon, J S Birkhead, R M Boyle, I Hutton, L Parsons, M T Rothman, T R Shaw.   

Abstract

The following recommendations are made: 1 Existing centres undertaking angioplasty should increase their activity, and the target figure of 400 PTCA procedures per million of the United Kingdom population should be achieved by the end of 1996-97, or immediately thereafter. 2 Angioplasty centres should be appropriately equipped to undertake PTCA safely and effectively and provide a reliable emergency service. They should have a minimum of two trained PTCA operators jointly undertaking a minimum of 200 procedures per year at that centre, and have regular meetings to share experience. 3 Angioplasty operators should ensure that where the need arises patients undergoing PTCA can receive immediate attention from a trained operator at any time until discharge from hospital. 4 Trained operators should undertake at least 1-2 PTCA procedures per week (> 60 procedures per year) to maintain competence, and those undertaking so few procedures should increase their activity over the next three years to more than 100 a year. 5 Trainers should have performed at least 500 procedures before formally training others and should undertake a minimum of 125 procedures a year to maintain accreditation as a trainer. 6 Surgical cover for PTCA procedures should be mandatory and on site cover remains the strongly preferred option. Where surgical cover is provided off site, this should be at a centre less than 30 minutes away by road. Whether provided on or off-site it should be possible to establish cardiopulmonary bypass within 90 minutes of the decision being made to refer the patient for surgery. 7 All operators and interventional centres should audit their activity and results, review these data locally with colleagues, and provide regular audit returns to the national database run by BCIS. This will allow future recommendations concerning standards to take more account of risk stratification and actual outcomes, and not place such emphasis merely on volumes of activity. 8 These recommendations should be reviewed in three years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8705774      PMCID: PMC484323          DOI: 10.1136/hrt.75.4.419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Heart        ISSN: 1355-6037            Impact factor:   5.994


  9 in total

1.  The critical question of procedure volume minimums for coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  T J Ryan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  Guidelines for percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty. A report of the American Heart Association/American College of Cardiology Task Force on Assessment of Diagnostic and Therapeutic Cardiovascular Procedures (Committee on Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty).

Authors:  T J Ryan; W B Bauman; J W Kennedy; D J Kereiakes; S B King; B D McCallister; S C Smith; D J Ullyot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Cardiac interventional procedures in the United Kingdom during 1991. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors:  P J Hubner
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1993-08

4.  The relation between the volume of coronary angioplasty procedures at hospitals treating Medicare beneficiaries and short-term mortality.

Authors:  J G Jollis; E D Peterson; E R DeLong; D B Mark; S R Collins; L H Muhlbaier; D B Pryor
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1994-12-15       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  Transluminal dilatation of coronary-artery stenosis.

Authors:  A Gruntzig
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1978-02-04       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  A comparison of immediate angioplasty with thrombolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. The Primary Angioplasty in Myocardial Infarction Study Group.

Authors:  C L Grines; K F Browne; J Marco; D Rothbaum; G W Stone; J O'Keefe; P Overlie; B Donohue; N Chelliah; G C Timmis
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  Immediate angioplasty compared with the administration of a thrombolytic agent followed by conservative treatment for myocardial infarction. The Mayo Coronary Care Unit and Catheterization Laboratory Groups.

Authors:  R J Gibbons; D R Holmes; G S Reeder; K R Bailey; M R Hopfenspirger; B J Gersh
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1993-03-11       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Coronary angioplasty. Statewide experience in California.

Authors:  J L Ritchie; K A Phillips; H S Luft
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 29.690

9.  The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications.

Authors:  S E Kimmel; J A Berlin; W K Laskey
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-11       Impact factor: 56.272

  9 in total
  9 in total

1.  Cardiac interventional procedures in the UK 1992 to 1996. Council of the British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors:  H H Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  Quality assurance in interventional cardiology. British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors:  J Perrins
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1999-10       Impact factor: 5.994

3.  Coronary angioplasty: guidelines for good practice and training. Joint Working Group on Coronary Angioplasty of the British Cardiac Society and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

4.  Death following coronary angioplasty.

Authors:  H H Gray; K G Callum
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 5.994

5.  Percutaneous coronary intervention: recommendations for good practice and training.

Authors:  K D Dawkins; T Gershlick; M de Belder; A Chauhan; G Venn; P Schofield; D Smith; J Watkins; H H Gray
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past?

Authors:  Mark A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.994

Review 7.  Clinical competence in electrophysiological techniques.

Authors:  R W Campbell; R Charles; J C Cowan; C Garratt; J M McComb; J Morgan; E Rowland; R Sutton
Journal:  Heart       Date:  1997-10       Impact factor: 5.994

8.  Hospital volume of throughput and periprocedural and medium-term adverse events after percutaneous coronary intervention: retrospective cohort study of all 17,417 procedures undertaken in Scotland, 1997-2003.

Authors:  K R Burton; R Slack; K G Oldroyd; A C H Pell; A D Flapan; I R Starkey; H Eteiba; K P Jennings; R J Northcote; W Stewart Hillis; J P Pell
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2006-05-18       Impact factor: 5.994

9.  Emergency cardiac surgery after a failed percutaneous coronary intervention in an interventional centre without on-site cardiac surgery.

Authors:  J S Lemkes; J O J Peels; R Huybregts; H de Swart; R Hautvast; V A W M Umans
Journal:  Neth Heart J       Date:  2007-05       Impact factor: 2.380

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.