Literature DB >> 7563484

The relationship between coronary angioplasty procedure volume and major complications.

S E Kimmel1, J A Berlin, W K Laskey.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the relationship between the volume of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty (PTCA) procedures performed in a cardiac catheterization laboratory and major complications after adjusting for case mix and to evaluate the applicability of current guidelines for minimum laboratory volume.
DESIGN: Cohort study using the 1992 and 1993 registries of the Society for Cardiac Angiography and Interventions.
SETTING: Forty-eight cardiac catheterization laboratories from throughout the United States and Canada. PATIENTS: All 19 594 consecutive patients without an acute myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing a first coronary balloon angioplasty. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Emergency bypass surgery, MI, or in-hospital death.
RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the rates of in-hospital mortality (P = .04), emergency bypass surgery (P < .001), MI (P - .001), and major complications (defined as one or more of these outcomes; P < .001) with increasing cardiac catheterization laboratory volume. After adjustment for case mix using multivariable analysis, these associations persisted, although the association with mortality was no longer statistically significant. There was no significant difference in outcomes in laboratories performing at least 200 vs fewer than 200 procedures per year, the currently recommended minimum laboratory volume (odds ratio [OR] for major complications, 0.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.53 to 1.25). However, a statistically significant decrease in major complications was observed in laboratories performing more than 400 procedures per year (adjusted OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46 to 0.96; P = .03; and OR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.38 to 0.78; P = .001) when laboratories performing 400 through 599 procedures and at least 600 procedures per year, respectively, are compared with those performing fewer than 200 per year.
CONCLUSIONS: An inverse association between cardiac catheterization laboratory procedure volume and major complications during PTCA exists independent of differences in patients' risk profiles. Our data suggest that the currently recommended minimum laboratory volume may be too low to distinguish higher-risk from lower-risk laboratories.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7563484

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JAMA        ISSN: 0098-7484            Impact factor:   56.272


  25 in total

1.  Coronary angioplasty: guidelines for good practice and training. Joint Working Group on Coronary Angioplasty of the British Cardiac Society and British Cardiovascular Intervention Society.

Authors: 
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-02       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A case study of hospital closure and centralization of coronary revascularization procedures.

Authors:  B R Hemmelgarn; W A Ghali; H Quan
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 3.  Volume of clinical activity in hospitals and healthcare outcomes, costs, and patient access.

Authors:  A Sowden; V Aletras; M Place; N Rice; A Eastwood; R Grilli; B Ferguson; J Posnett; T Sheldon
Journal:  Qual Health Care       Date:  1997-06

Review 4.  ABC of interventional cardiology: percutaneous coronary intervention. II: the procedure.

Authors:  Ever D Grech
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-05-24

5.  [Position document on quality assurance in invasive cardiology. Are minimum numbers in percutaneous coronary angioplasty evidence based?].

Authors:  A Vogt; Ruth H Strasser
Journal:  Z Kardiol       Date:  2004-10

6.  On-site surgical standby for percutaneous coronary intervention: a thing of the past?

Authors:  Mark A de Belder
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 5.994

7.  Does certificate of need affect cardiac outcomes and costs?

Authors:  Vivian Ho
Journal:  Int J Health Care Finance Econ       Date:  2007-03-06

8.  Volume-outcome relationship in revision hip replacement - Results from a low volume hospital.

Authors:  Fahim Anwar; Kalpesh Shah; Ian McLean
Journal:  J Orthop       Date:  2013-08-12

9.  Poor outcomes for children on the wait list at low-volume kidney transplant centers in the United States.

Authors:  Abbas Rana; Eileen D Brewer; Brandi B Scully; Michael L Kueht; Matt Goss; Karim J Halazun; Hao Liu; N Thao N Galvan; Ronald T Cotton; Christine A O'Mahony
Journal:  Pediatr Nephrol       Date:  2016-10-18       Impact factor: 3.714

10.  The delay to thrombolysis: an analysis of hospital and patient characteristics. Quebec Acute Coronary Care Working Group.

Authors:  J M Brophy; J G Diodati; P Bogaty; P Théroux
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-02-24       Impact factor: 8.262

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.