Literature DB >> 8704359

The genetics of proximal femur geometry, distribution of bone mass and bone mineral density.

C W Slemenda1, C H Turner, M Peacock, J C Christian, J Sorbel, S L Hui, C C Johnston.   

Abstract

To estimate genetic effects on femoral neck geometry and the distribution of bone mineral within the proximal femur a cross-sectional twin analysis was carried out at a university hospital that compared correlations in these traits in pairs of mono- and dizygotic female twins. Monozygotic (MZ, n = 51 pairs, age 49.1 +/- 9.3 years) and dizygotic (DZ, n = 26 pairs, age 45.7 +/- 11.3 years) twins were randomly selected from a larger sample of twins previously studied. Measurements of bone mineral density (BMD), femoral neck angles and length, cross-sectional area and moment of interia, the center of mass of the narrowest cross-section of the femoral neck, and BMDs of regions within the femoral neck were made. A summary index of the resistance of the femoral neck to forces experienced in a fall with impact on the greater trochanter (Fall Index, FI) was calculated. MZ pair intraclass correlations (rMZ) were significantly (p < 0.05) different from zero for all bone mass and femoral geometry variables (0.35 < rMZ < 0.82). DZ pair correlations (rDZ) were lower than rMZ for all variables (0.04 < rDZ < 0.52) except femoral neck length (rDZ = 0.38, rMZ = 0.36). After adjustment for BMD of the femoral neck, rMZ was significantly greater than rDZ, yielding high heritability estimates for regional BMDs (0.72 < H2 < 0.78), the center of mass of the femoral neck (H2 = 0.70, -0.04 to 1.43 95% CI) and the resistance of the femoral neck to forces experienced in a fall (FI, H2 = 0.94, 0.06 to 1.85 95% CI), but not for femoral neck length. Adjustments for age did not alter these findings. It is concluded that there are significant familial influences on the distribution of femoral bone mass and on the calculated structural strength of the proximal femur, but not on femoral neck length. If the assumptions of the twin model are correct, this is evidence for genetic factors influencing these traits.

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8704359     DOI: 10.1007/BF01623944

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  13 in total

1.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adult women: a reevaluation of the twin model and the potential importance of gene interaction on heritability estimates.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; C J Williams; J A Norton; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1991-06       Impact factor: 6.741

2.  Genetic determinants of bone mass in adults. A twin study.

Authors:  N A Pocock; J A Eisman; J L Hopper; M G Yeates; P N Sambrook; S Eberl
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

3.  Genetic factors in determining bone mass.

Authors:  D M Smith; W E Nance; K W Kang; J C Christian; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1973-11       Impact factor: 14.808

4.  Better discrimination of hip fracture using bone density, geometry and architecture.

Authors:  M Peacock; C H Turner; G Liu; A K Manatunga; L Timmerman; C C Johnston
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Do variations in hip geometry explain differences in hip fracture risk between Japanese and white Americans?

Authors:  T Nakamura; C H Turner; T Yoshikawa; C W Slemenda; M Peacock; D B Burr; Y Mizuno; H Orimo; Y Ouchi; C C Johnston
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.741

6.  Geometric structure of the femoral neck measured using dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  T Yoshikawa; C H Turner; M Peacock; C W Slemenda; C M Weaver; D Teegarden; P Markwardt; D B Burr
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 6.741

7.  Long-term bone loss in men: effects of genetic and environmental factors.

Authors:  C W Slemenda; J C Christian; T Reed; T K Reister; C J Williams; C C Johnston
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1992-08-15       Impact factor: 25.391

8.  Pre-existing fractures and bone mass predict vertebral fracture incidence in women.

Authors:  P D Ross; J W Davis; R S Epstein; R D Wasnich
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1991-06-01       Impact factor: 25.391

9.  Bone density at various sites for prediction of hip fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  S R Cummings; D M Black; M C Nevitt; W Browner; J Cauley; K Ensrud; H K Genant; L Palermo; J Scott; T M Vogt
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-01-09       Impact factor: 79.321

10.  Prediction of hip fractures from pelvic radiographs: the study of osteoporotic fractures. The Study of Osteoporotic Fractures Research Group.

Authors:  C C Glüer; S R Cummings; A Pressman; J Li; K Glüer; K G Faulkner; S Grampp; H K Genant
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 6.741

View more
  31 in total

Review 1.  Regulation of bone mass by mechanical loading: microarchitecture and genetics.

Authors:  Larry J Suva; Dana Gaddy; Daniel S Perrien; Ruth L Thomas; David M Findlay
Journal:  Curr Osteoporos Rep       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 5.096

2.  Genetic determination and correlation of body weight and body mass index (BMI) and cross-sectional geometric parameters of the femoral neck.

Authors:  Hong Xu; Ji-Rong Long; Yan-Jun Yang; Fei-Yan Deng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-09-02       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Association analysis of estrogen receptor alpha gene polymorphisms with cross-sectional geometry of the femoral neck in Caucasian nuclear families.

Authors:  Dong-Hai Xiong; Yao-Zhong Liu; Peng-Yuan Liu; Lan-Juan Zhao; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-15       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Genetics of osteoporosis from genome-wide association studies: advances and challenges.

Authors:  J Brent Richards; Hou-Feng Zheng; Tim D Spector
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2012-07-18       Impact factor: 53.242

5.  High bone mineral density among perimenopausal women.

Authors:  Janne Pesonen; Joonas Sirola; Marjo Tuppurainen; Jukka Jurvelin; Esko Alhava; Risto Honkanen; Heikki Kröger
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-06-16       Impact factor: 4.507

6.  Polymorphisms in genes in the RANKL/RANK/OPG pathway are associated with bone mineral density at different skeletal sites in post-menopausal women.

Authors:  P Tu; P Duan; R-S Zhang; D-B Xu; Y Wang; H-P Wu; Y-H Liu; L Si
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Genome-wide copy-number-variation study identified a susceptibility gene, UGT2B17, for osteoporosis.

Authors:  Tie-Lin Yang; Xiang-Ding Chen; Yan Guo; Shu-Feng Lei; Jin-Tang Wang; Qi Zhou; Feng Pan; Yuan Chen; Zhi-Xin Zhang; Shan-Shan Dong; Xiang-Hong Xu; Han Yan; Xiaogang Liu; Chuan Qiu; Xue-Zhen Zhu; Teng Chen; Meng Li; Hong Zhang; Liang Zhang; Betty M Drees; James J Hamilton; Christopher J Papasian; Robert R Recker; Xiao-Ping Song; Jing Cheng; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Am J Hum Genet       Date:  2008-11-06       Impact factor: 11.025

8.  Pathway-based genome-wide association analysis identified the importance of EphrinA-EphR pathway for femoral neck bone geometry.

Authors:  Yuan Chen; Dong-Hai Xiong; Yan-Fang Guo; Feng Pan; Qi Zhou; Feng Zhang; Hong-Wen Deng
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2009-09-26       Impact factor: 4.398

9.  Unique and common genetic effects between bone mineral density and calcaneal quantitative ultrasound measures: the Fels Longitudinal Study.

Authors:  M Lee; S A Czerwinski; A C Choh; E W Demerath; S S Sun; W C Chumlea; B Towne; R M Siervogel
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 10.  Epidemiology of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Elizabeth J Samelson; Marian T Hannan
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 4.592

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.