Literature DB >> 8703598

Lingual nerve damage during lower third molar removal: a comparison of two surgical methods.

P P Robinson1, K G Smith.   

Abstract

The high incidence of lingual sensory disturbance following lower third molar removal in the UK may be due to the elevation of a lingual flap and insertion of a Howarth's periosteal elevator, in an attempt to protect the lingual nerve. We have therefore studied the validity of this technique by recording the incidence of temporary and permanent lingual nerve injury during 771 operations randomly allocated to be carried out with or without lingual flap retraction. Surgery with lingual flap retraction resulted in lingual sensory disturbance in 6.9% and this persisted, requiring lingual nerve repair, in 0.8%. Surgery without lingual flap retraction resulted in lingual sensory disturbance in 0.8% (P < 0.0001) and this persisted, requiring lingual nerve repair, in 0.3%. We conclude that avoidance of lingual retraction reduces the incidence of temporary lingual nerve disturbance and does not increase the incidence of permanent damage. This indicates that use of the Howarth's in this way is invalid, and suggests that for the majority of cases, lingual retraction should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703598     DOI: 10.1038/sj.bdj.4809126

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br Dent J        ISSN: 0007-0610            Impact factor:   1.626


  14 in total

1.  Necessity of 3D visualization for the removal of lower wisdom teeth: required sample size to prove non-inferiority of panoramic radiography compared to CBCT.

Authors:  Felix Roeder; Daniel Wachtlin; Ralf Schulze
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2011-04-26       Impact factor: 3.573

Review 2.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2010-04-08

Review 3.  Impacted wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Thomas B Dodson; Srinivas M Susarla
Journal:  BMJ Clin Evid       Date:  2014-08-29

4.  Prevention of neurological injuries during mandibular third molar surgery: technical notes.

Authors:  Gerardo La Monaca; Iole Vozza; Rita Giardino; Susanna Annibali; Nicola Pranno; Maria Paola Cristalli
Journal:  Ann Stomatol (Roma)       Date:  2017-11-08

5.  The effect of modified surgical flap design for removal of lower third molars on lingual nerve injury.

Authors:  Anwar B Bataineh; Ra'ad A Batarseh
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2016-11-12       Impact factor: 3.573

6.  An audit of general dental practitioners' referral practice following the distribution of third molar guidelines.

Authors:  S F Worrall
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Factors influencing lingual nerve paraesthesia following third molar surgery: a prospective clinical study.

Authors:  H S Charan Babu; Praveen B Reddy; Rajesh Kumar B Pattathan; Rajendra Desai; A B Shubha
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2012-08-24

8.  Nerve Injury After Surgical Excision of Mandibular Third Molars Under Local Anesthesia: An Audit.

Authors:  Ashok Ramadorai; Andrew B G Tay; Gayathri Vasanthakumar; W K Lye
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2018-09-19

9.  Iatrogenic injury to oral branches of the trigeminal nerve: records of 449 cases.

Authors:  Søren Hillerup
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 3.606

10.  Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.

Authors:  Edmund Bailey; Wafa Kashbour; Neha Shah; Helen V Worthington; Tara F Renton; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-26
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.