Literature DB >> 8703252

Postterm pregnancy: putting the merits of a policy of induction of labor into perspective.

M E Hannah, C Huh, S A Hewson, W J Hannah.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Several randomized, controlled trials compared the policies of induction of labor and expectant management for women who reach 41 weeks' gestation, and although they suggest a better outcome for mothers and infants with such a policy in place, controversy continues as to which is the better form of care. The Canadian Multicenter Postterm Pregnancy Trial (CMPPT) enrolled 3407 women, of whom 1701 were randomized to a policy of induction of labor (induced group) and 1706 were randomized to a policy of expectant management (expectant group). Secondary analyses of data from the CMPPT were undertaken to explore a number of controversial issues.
METHODS: We used data from the CMPPT to explore further the timing of delivery for women enrolled between 41 0/7 and 41 6/7 weeks' gestation, the potential impact of more liberal use of prostaglandins on cesarean section rates, and the relative merits of induced versus spontaneous labor in the two groups.
RESULTS: Most women in the CMPPT (89%) were enrolled at 41 0/7 to 41 6/7 weeks' gestation, of whom 86.2 percent in the induced group and 63.6 percent in the expectant group gave birth before 42 weeks' gestation. Assuming that administration of prostaglandins would reduce the likelihood of cesarean section by 12 to 15 percent, cesarean section rates were reduced in the induction group from 21.2 percent to 20.8 to 20.9 percent, and in the expectant group from 24.5 percent 23.3 to 24.2 percent. If labor was induced as part of a policy of expectant management, the cesarean section rate was much higher (33.5%) than if labor was either spontaneous or induced as part of a policy of induction (18.5%, 22.4%).
CONCLUSIONS: Women should be informed of the benefits and risks associated with the policies of induction of labor and expectant management, and their preferences regarding these policies should be respected.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8703252     DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-536x.1996.tb00455.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Birth        ISSN: 0730-7659            Impact factor:   3.689


  7 in total

1.  Effect of labour induction on rates of stillbirth and cesarean section in post-term pregnancies.

Authors:  A K Sue-A-Quan; M E Hannah; M M Cohen; G A Foster; R M Liston
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1999-04-20       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Induction of labour: a continuous quality improvement and peer review program to improve the quality of care.

Authors:  S Harris; B Buchinski; S Grzybowski; P Janssen; G W Mitchell; D Farquharson; S Gryzbowski
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2000-10-31       Impact factor: 8.262

3.  Maternity care calendar wheel. Improved obstetric wheel developed in British Columbia.

Authors:  S Grzybowski; R Nout; M Kirkham
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1999-03       Impact factor: 3.275

Review 4.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  A Metin Gülmezoglu; Caroline A Crowther; Philippa Middleton; Emer Heatley
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2012-06-13

5.  Induction of labor compared to expectant management in low-risk women and associated perinatal outcomes.

Authors:  Yvonne W Cheng; Anjali J Kaimal; Jonathan M Snowden; James M Nicholson; Aaron B Caughey
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-09-22       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Induction of labour at or beyond 37 weeks' gestation.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Jonathan Morris; Caroline A Crowther; Judith C Gomersall
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2020-07-15

Review 7.  Induction of labour for improving birth outcomes for women at or beyond term.

Authors:  Philippa Middleton; Emily Shepherd; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-05-09
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.