Literature DB >> 8701453

Clinical toxicity and laboratory effects of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim) mobilization and blood stem cell apheresis from normal donors, and analysis of charges for the procedures.

P Anderlini1, D Przepiorka, D Seong, P Miller, J Sundberg, B Lichtiger, F Norfleet, K W Chan, R Champlin, M Körbling.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Apheresis of granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (filgrastim)-mobilized blood stem cells from normal donors is now being used in place of a marrow harvest in transplantation. How the adverse effects of and charges for this procedure compare with those of the standard marrow harvest is not known. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Forty consecutive normal subjects who received filgrastim 96 micrograms/kg) subcutaneously twice daily for 4 to 6 days in preparation for apheresis were monitored prospectively by clinical and laboratory evaluation.
RESULTS: Sixty-two percent of the subjects required oral analgesics. None discontinued filgrastim prematurely. Bone pain (82%), headache (70%), fatigue (20%), and nausea (10%) were reported. Filgrastim caused a mean eightfold increase in neutrophil counts, a mean twofold increase in lymphocyte counts, a mean twofold rise in alkaline phosphatase and lactate dehydrogenase levels, and minor changes in serum potassium, magnesium, and uric acid. Adverse events and laboratory effects resolved within 7 days after apheresis. No apheresis stem cell donor required transfusion or hospitalization, and only one required an additional clinic visit after completion of apheresis. By comparison, a retrospective analysis of 33 normal marrow donors demonstrated that all received transfusion(s), 3 were hospitalized, 3 required additional clinic visits after the marrow harvest. The median total charges related to the two procedures were comparable (p = 0.43), although the charges were significantly lower for donors requiring only one apheresis procedure (p = 0.002).
CONCLUSION: Filgrastim mobilization and apheresis of blood stem cells constitute a safe, well-tolerated, and comparable or less expensive alternative to the traditional marrow harvest.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8701453     DOI: 10.1046/j.1537-2995.1996.36796323057.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transfusion        ISSN: 0041-1132            Impact factor:   3.157


  17 in total

1.  PBSC collection from family donors in Japan: a prospective survey.

Authors:  Y Kodera; K Yamamoto; M Harada; Y Morishima; H Dohy; S Asano; Y Ikeda; T Nakahata; M Imamura; K Kawa; S Kato; M Tanimoto; Y Kanda; R Tanosaki; S Shiobara; S W Kim; K Nagafuji; M Hino; K Miyamura; R Suzuki; N Hamajima; M Fukushima; A Tamakoshi; J Halter; N Schmitz; D Niederwieser; A Gratwohl
Journal:  Bone Marrow Transplant       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 5.483

Review 2.  Mobilization of hematopoietic stem and progenitor cells using inhibitors of CXCR4 and VLA-4.

Authors:  M P Rettig; G Ansstas; J F DiPersio
Journal:  Leukemia       Date:  2011-09-02       Impact factor: 11.528

3.  Donor Experiences of Second Marrow or Peripheral Blood Stem Cell Collection Mirror the First, but CD34+ Yields Are Less.

Authors:  David F Stroncek; Bronwen E Shaw; Brent R Logan; Deidre M Kiefer; Bipin N Savani; Paolo Anderlini; Christopher N Bredeson; Peiman Hematti; Siddhartha Ganguly; Miguel Angel Diaz; Hisham Abdel-Azim; Ibrahim Ahmed; Dipnarine Maharaj; Matthew Seftel; Amer Beitinjaneh; Sachiko Seo; Jean A Yared; Joerg Halter; Paul V O'Donnell; Gregory A Hale; Zachariah DeFilipp; Hillard Lazarus; Jane L Liesveld; Zheng Zhou; Pashna Munshi; Richard F Olsson; Kimberly Anne Kasow; Jeffrey Szer; Galen E Switzer; Pintip Chitphakdithai; Nirali Shah; Dennis L Confer; Michael A Pulsipher
Journal:  Biol Blood Marrow Transplant       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 4.  An update on drug-induced arthritis.

Authors:  Marwan H Adwan
Journal:  Rheumatol Int       Date:  2016-03-21       Impact factor: 2.631

5.  Neuroprotective therapy using granulocyte colony-stimulating factor for acute spinal cord injury: a phase I/IIa clinical trial.

Authors:  Hiroshi Takahashi; Masashi Yamazaki; Akihiko Okawa; Tsuyoshi Sakuma; Kei Kato; Mitsuhiro Hashimoto; Koichi Hayashi; Takeo Furuya; Takayuki Fujiyoshi; Junko Kawabe; Tomonori Yamauchi; Chikato Mannoji; Tomohiro Miyashita; Ryo Kadota; Masayuki Hashimoto; Yasuo Ito; Kazuhisa Takahashi; Masao Koda
Journal:  Eur Spine J       Date:  2012-03-06       Impact factor: 3.134

Review 6.  Granulocyte transfusion in the G-CSF era.

Authors:  Thomas H Price
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 2.490

7.  Flashback 1997: collection of hematopoietic progenitor cells by peripheral blood apheresis after stimulation with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor.

Authors:  Willy A Flegel; Karen M Byrne; Harvey G Klein
Journal:  Transfusion       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 3.157

8.  Chronic AMD3100 antagonism of SDF-1alpha-CXCR4 exacerbates cardiac dysfunction and remodeling after myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Shujing Dai; Fangping Yuan; Jingyao Mu; Chengxin Li; Ning Chen; Shangzhi Guo; Justin Kingery; Sumanth D Prabhu; Roberto Bolli; Gregg Rokosh
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2010-07-23       Impact factor: 5.000

Review 9.  Hematopoietic stem cell donation.

Authors:  Shu-Huey Chen; Tso-Fu Wang; Kuo-Liang Yang
Journal:  Int J Hematol       Date:  2013-02-19       Impact factor: 2.490

10.  A population pharmacodynamic model for lactate dehydrogenase and neuron specific enolase to predict tumor progression in small cell lung cancer patients.

Authors:  Núria Buil-Bruna; José-María López-Picazo; Marta Moreno-Jiménez; Salvador Martín-Algarra; Benjamin Ribba; Iñaki F Trocóniz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2014-04-17       Impact factor: 4.009

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.