Literature DB >> 8700775

Influence of different factors on bond strength of hybrid ionomers.

K H Friedl1, J M Powers, K A Hiller.   

Abstract

A new generation of filling materials, the hybrid-ionomer cements, has been introduced recently. In many clinical situations these hybrid ionomers may be an alternative to conventional glass-ionomer cements and resins bonded with dentin bonding agents. During the past years research has focused on factors influencing bond strength of dentin bonding systems, but there is not much knowledge about the bond strength of hybrid- and glass-ionomer filling materials under different conditions. Bond strengths of four hybrid ionomers, one conventional glass-ionomer cement, and one cermet cement were determined in superficial and deep, dry and moist dentin using a simplified pulp chamber model. All materials showed significantly higher bond strength to superficial compared to deep dentin. Moisture showed no significant influence on any material neither in deep nor in superficial dentin. Bond strengths of Fuji II LC, Variglass, and Vitremer were distinctly higher than those of the conventional glass-ionomer cement (Ketac-Fil) and the cermet cement (Ketac-Silver), while that of Photac-Fil was not significantly different. Ionomer samples failed cohesively in superficial dentin in over 60% of the samples. The bonding interfaces between Fuji II LC and Variglass and the treated dentin surface showed tags but no distinct hybrid layer. Bond strength is not only dependent on the pretreatment of the dentin, but also on the glass-ionomer resin composition of the material.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 8700775

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  9 in total

1.  Association of age and gender of patients undergoing class V tooth coloured restoration in maxillary teeth.

Authors:  Shreya Kothari; Manish Ranjan; Balaji Ganesh
Journal:  Bioinformation       Date:  2020-12-31

2.  Microleakage after Thermocycling of Three Self-Etch Adhesives under Resin-Modified Glass-Ionomer Cement Restorations.

Authors:  Sabine O Geerts; Laurence Seidel; Adelin I Albert; Audrey M Gueders
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2010-06-06

3.  Microleakage of glass ionomer formulations after erbium:yttrium-aluminium-garnet laser preparation.

Authors:  Katleen I M Delmé; Peter J Deman; Mieke A A De Bruyne; Samir Nammour; Roeland J G De Moor
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2008-08-21       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Effect of 4% titanium tetrafluoride application on shear bond strength of composite resin: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Saraswathi Devabhaktuni; Mk Manjunath
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2011-01

5.  Comparison of shear bond strength of aesthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  B P Suryakumari Nujella; Manisha T Choudary; Satyanarayana P Reddy; M Kiran Kumar; T Gopal
Journal:  Contemp Clin Dent       Date:  2012-01

6.  Long-Term Water Balance Evaluation in Glass Ionomer Restorative Materials.

Authors:  Howard Roberts; David Berzins; John Nicholson
Journal:  Materials (Basel)       Date:  2022-01-21       Impact factor: 3.623

7.  Evaluation of the Surface Hardness and Roughness of a Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cement Containing Bacterial Cellulose Nanocrystals.

Authors:  Maryam Saadat; Marzieh Moradian; Babak Mirshekari
Journal:  Int J Dent       Date:  2021-12-11

8.  Comparative Evaluation of Shear Bond Strength of Nanohybrid Composite Restoration After the Placement of Flowable Compomer and Composite Using the Snowplow Technique.

Authors:  Meghna Dugar; Anuja Ikhar; Pradnya Nikhade; Manoj Chandak; Nidhi Motwani
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-09-01

9.  Effect of the Er: YAG laser on the shear bond strength of conventional glass ionomer and Biodentine™ to dentine.

Authors:  Abtesam Aljdaimi; Hugh Devlin; Mark Dickinson
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2018 Jul-Sep
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.