Literature DB >> 8698586

Chronic disease, functional health status, and demographics: a multi-dimensional approach to risk adjustment.

M C Hornbrook1, M J Goodman.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The goal of this study was to develop unbiased risk-assessment models to be used for paying health plans on the basis of enrollee health status and use propensity. We explored the risk structure of adult employed HMO members using self-reported morbidities, functional status, perceived health status, and demographic characteristics. DATA SOURCES/STUDY
SETTING: Data were collected on a random sample of members of a large, federally qualified, prepaid group practice, hospital-based HMO located in the Pacific Northwest. STUDY
DESIGN: Multivariate linear nonparametric techniques were used to estimate risk weights on demographic, morbidity, and health status factors at the individual level. The dependent variable was annual real total health plan expense for covered services for the year following the survey. Repeated random split-sample validation techniques minimized outlier influences and avoided inappropriate distributional assumptions required by parametric techniques. DATA COLLECTION/EXTRACTION
METHODS: A mail questionnaire containing an abbreviated medical history and the RAND-36 Health Survey was administered to a 5 percent sample of adult subscribers and their spouses in 1990 and 1991, with an overall 44 percent response rate. Utilization data were extracted from HMO automated information systems. Annual expenses were computed by weighting all utilization elements by standard unit costs for the HMO. PRINCIPAL
FINDINGS: Prevalence of such major chronic diseases as heart disease, diabetes, depression, and asthma improve prediction of future medical expense; functional health status and morbidities are each better than simple demographic factors alone; functional and perceived health status as well as demographic characteristics and diagnoses together yield the best prediction performance and reduce opportunities for selection bias. We also found evidence of important interaction effects between functional/perceived health status scales and disease classes.
CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported morbidities and functional health status are useful risk measures for adults. Risk-assessment research should focus on combining clinical information with social survey techniques to capitalize on the strengths of both approaches. Disease-specific functional health status scales should be developed and tested to capture the most information for prediction.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8698586      PMCID: PMC1070120     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Serv Res        ISSN: 0017-9124            Impact factor:   3.402


  19 in total

1.  Using health indicators in calculating the AAPCC (adjusted average per capita cost).

Authors:  R W Whitmore; J E Paul; D A Gibbs; J C Beebe
Journal:  Adv Health Econ Health Serv Res       Date:  1989

2.  A method for risk-adjusting employer contributions to competing health insurance plans.

Authors:  J C Robinson; H S Luft; L B Gardner; E M Morrison
Journal:  Inquiry       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 1.730

3.  The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

Authors:  J E Ware; C D Sherbourne
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Societal and individual determinants of medical care utilization in the United States.

Authors:  R Andersen; J F Newman
Journal:  Milbank Mem Fund Q Health Soc       Date:  1973

5.  Including a measure of health status in Medicare's health maintenance organization capitation formula: reliability issues.

Authors:  R Lichtenstein; J W Thomas
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1987-02       Impact factor: 2.983

6.  Patient selection in a competitive health care system.

Authors:  H S Luft; R H Miller
Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)       Date:  1988       Impact factor: 6.301

Review 7.  Risk adjustment for a children's capitation rate.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; E M Sloss; W G Manning; E B Keeler
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1993

8.  Adjusting capitation using chronic disease risk factors: a preliminary study.

Authors:  J Howland; J Stokes; S C Crane; A J Belanger
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1987

Review 9.  Capitation payment: using predictors for medical utilization to adjust rates.

Authors:  A M Epstein; E J Cumella
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1988

10.  Adjusting capitation rates using objective health measures and prior utilization.

Authors:  J P Newhouse; W G Manning; E B Keeler; E M Sloss
Journal:  Health Care Financ Rev       Date:  1989
View more
  40 in total

1.  Risk adjustment of Florida mental health outcomes data: concepts, methods, and results.

Authors:  M G Dow; T L Boaz; D Thornton
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-08       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  A structural equation modeling approach to examining the predictive power of determinants of individuals' health expenditures.

Authors:  Jin-Yuan Chern; Thomas T H Wan; James W Begun
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 4.460

3.  Medical cost-offset following treatment referral for alcohol and other drug use disorders in a group model HMO.

Authors:  Michael R Polen; Donald K Freeborn; Frances L Lynch; John P Mullooly; Daniel M Dickinson
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2006-07       Impact factor: 1.505

4.  Change in health status and mortality as indicators of outcomes: comparison between the Medicare Advantage Program and the Veterans Health Administration.

Authors:  Alfredo J Selim; Lewis E Kazis; William Rogers; Shirley X Qian; James A Rothendler; Avron Spiro; Xinhua S Ren; Donald Miller; Bernardo J Selim; Benjamin G Fincke
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2007-05-25       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 5.  HMO data systems in population studies of access to care.

Authors:  R Fink
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Health status assessment. Completing the clinical database.

Authors:  A W Wu; K A Cagney; P D St John
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

7.  Mortality predictive indexes for the community-dwelling elderly US population.

Authors:  Zi Zhang; Dawei Xie; Jibby E Kurichi; Joel Streim; Guangyu Zhang; Margaret G Stineman
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-16       Impact factor: 5.128

8.  Effect of external variables on the performance of the geriatric comorbidity score derived from prescription claims in the community-dwelling elderly.

Authors:  Sarah-Gabrielle Béland; Cara Tannenbaum; Thierry Ducruet; Michel Préville; Djamal Berbiche; Yola Moride
Journal:  Drugs Aging       Date:  2012-11       Impact factor: 3.923

9.  The sensitivity of the MOS SF-12 and PROMIS® global summary scores to adverse health events in an older cohort.

Authors:  Joanne Allen; Fiona M Alpass; Christine V Stephens
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 4.147

10.  Changes in the SF-8 scores among healthy non-smoking school teachers after the enforcement of a smoke-free school policy: a comparison by passive smoke status.

Authors:  Kosuke Kiyohara; Yuri Itani; Takashi Kawamura; Yoshitaka Matsumoto; Yuko Takahashi
Journal:  Health Qual Life Outcomes       Date:  2010-04-28       Impact factor: 3.186

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.