Literature DB >> 8697304

Modification of the sensitivity of glucose sensor implanted into subcutaneous tissue.

V Thomé-Duret1, M N Gangnerau, Y Zhang, G S Wilson, G Reach.   

Abstract

The mechanism of reducing the glucose sensitivity of sensors implanted into the subcutaneous tissue of the normal rat was evaluated (n = 10) by comparing sensitivities observed in vitro and in vivo. In vivo sensitivity was significantly lower than that observed in vitro before implantation (p < 0.005). Most interestingly, in vitro sensitivity immediately after explanation did not differ from that in vivo and increased progressively during rinsing (p < 0.02 after 30 min). These results demonstrate that the reduction of in vivo sensitivity was not due to a local factor or factors but to a reversible alteration of the glucose sensor characteristics induced in vivo by some local factor(s). This suggests that modifications of the outer sensor membrane, the nature of which remains to be determined, may prevent this effect and resolve the problem.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8697304

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Metab        ISSN: 1262-3636            Impact factor:   6.041


  9 in total

1.  In vivo glucose sensing for diabetes management: progress towards non-invasive monitoring. Interview by Judy Jones.

Authors:  J Pickup; O Rolinski; D Birch
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1999-11-13

2.  Glucose sensor membranes for mitigating the foreign body response.

Authors:  Ahyeon Koh; Scott P Nichols; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2011-09-01

3.  Use of Enzymatic Biosensors to Quantify Endogenous ATP or H2O2 in the Kidney.

Authors:  Oleg Palygin; Vladislav Levchenko; Louise C Evans; Gregory Blass; Allen W Cowley; Alexander Staruschenko
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2015-10-12       Impact factor: 1.355

4.  Continuous amperometric monitoring of glucose in a brittle diabetic chimpanzee with a miniature subcutaneous electrode.

Authors:  J G Wagner; D W Schmidtke; C P Quinn; T F Fleming; B Bernacky; A Heller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1998-05-26       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Preclinical Performance Evaluation of Percutaneous Glucose Biosensors: Experimental Considerations and Recommendations.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2015-06-17

Review 6.  In Vivo Chemical Sensors: Role of Biocompatibility on Performance and Utility.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jackson R Hall; Micah D Brown; James B Taylor; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2016-11-21       Impact factor: 6.986

7.  Design Considerations for Silica-Particle-Doped Nitric-Oxide-Releasing Polyurethane Glucose Biosensor Membranes.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Jonathon B Schofield; Shaylyn E Walter; Maggie J Malone-Povolny; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  ACS Sens       Date:  2016-12-15       Impact factor: 7.711

Review 8.  Biocompatible materials for continuous glucose monitoring devices.

Authors:  Scott P Nichols; Ahyeon Koh; Wesley L Storm; Jae Ho Shin; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2013-02-07       Impact factor: 60.622

9.  In vivo analytical performance of nitric oxide-releasing glucose biosensors.

Authors:  Robert J Soto; Benjamin J Privett; Mark H Schoenfisch
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 6.986

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.