Literature DB >> 8696703

Reference ranges of bone mineral density for women in southern England: the impact of local data on the diagnosis of osteoporosis.

G W Petley1, A M Cotton, A J Murrills, P A Taylor, C Cooper, M I Cawley, T J Wilkin.   

Abstract

The construction of reference ranges that accurately represent the population at large is essential for the correct identification of osteoporosis from bone mineral density (BMD) measurements. In this study, reference data supplied by the manufacturer of the Lunar DPX+ bone densitometer were compared with data obtained locally. Lumbar spine, proximal femur and total body BMD measurements were made in an age-stratified random sample of 702 Southampton women aged 20 to 89 years. Relevant demographic and medical data were recorded for each subject using a questionnaire. Reference curves of BMD (mean +/- SD) were plotted against age for each measurement site and were found to be higher than the manufacturer's reference values at all ages and sites. Exclusion of women with factors known to affect bone mass only served to increase this discrepancy. According to World Health Organisation definitions, osteoporosis may be identified from BMD values alone. Based upon neck of femur BMD values, 100 (14.8%) of the women in this study group were categorized as osteoporotic using local young normal reference data, compared with only 39 (5.8%) using the manufacturer's data. By normalizing for age distribution, these findings were extrapolated to the local population where it was predicted that 26.0% and 10.1% of females over 50 years of age would be classified as osteoporotic using the respective reference ranges. This study clearly illustrates how the numbers of women diagnosed as osteoporotic vary with the use of different reference populations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8696703     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-69-823-655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  Variations in diagnostic performances of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry in the northwest of The Netherlands.

Authors:  Klaas P Staal; Jan C Roos; Radu A Manoliu; Piet J Kostense; Paul Lips
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Definition of a population-specific DXA reference standard in Italian women: the Densitometric Italian Normative Study (DINS).

Authors:  M Pedrazzoni; G Girasole; F Bertoldo; G Bianchi; C Cepollaro; A Del Puente; S Giannini; S Gonnelli; D Maggio; C Marcocci; S Minisola; E Palummeri; M Rossini; L Sartori; L Sinigaglia
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-10-03       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Bone mineral density of the spine and femur in healthy Saudis.

Authors:  M Salleh M Ardawi; Abdulraouf A Maimany; Talal M Bahksh; Hasan A N Nasrat; Waleed A Milaat; Raja M Al-Raddadi
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2004-05-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  Health-related quality of life in patients with osteoporosis in the absence of vertebral fracture: a systematic review.

Authors:  S Wilson; C A Sharp; M W J Davie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2012-07-20       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Quantitative ultrasound of the calcaneus in a Korean population: reference data and relationship to bone mineral density determined by peripheral dual X-ray absorptiometry.

Authors:  Min-Ho Shin; Sun-Seog Kweon; Kyeong-Soo Park; Heon Heo; Seung-joon Kim; Hae-Sung Nam; Seul-Ki Jeong; Eun-Kyung Chung; Jin-Su Choi
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 2.153

6.  Population-based reference values for bone mineral density in young men.

Authors:  M Høiberg; T L Nielsen; K Wraae; B Abrahamsen; C Hagen; M Andersen; K Brixen
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2007-05-30       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Peak bone mass from longitudinal data: implications for the prevalence, pathophysiology, and diagnosis of osteoporosis.

Authors:  Claudie Berger; David Goltzman; Lisa Langsetmo; Lawrence Joseph; Stuart Jackson; Nancy Kreiger; Alan Tenenhouse; K Shawn Davison; Robert G Josse; Jerilynn C Prior; David A Hanley
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Apparent bone mineral density estimated from DXA in healthy men and women.

Authors:  Selma Cvijetić; Mirko Korsić
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2003-11-20       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Normative data of bone Mineral Density in healthy population of Tehran, Iran: a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Bagher Larijani; Arash Hossein-Nezhad; Alireza Mojtahedi; Mohammad Pajouhi; Mohammad H Bastanhagh; Akbar Soltani; Seyed-Zahra Mirfezi; Roya Dashti
Journal:  BMC Musculoskelet Disord       Date:  2005-07-02       Impact factor: 2.362

10.  Significant differences in UK and US female bone density reference ranges.

Authors:  E Noon; S Singh; J Cuzick; T D Spector; F M K Williams; M L Frost; A Howell; M Harvie; R Eastell; R E Coleman; I Fogelman; G M Blake
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-01-09       Impact factor: 4.507

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.