Literature DB >> 8692951

Naturally occurring variation in copia expression is due to both element (cis) and host (trans) regulatory variation.

L V Matyunina1, I K Jordan, J F McDonald.   

Abstract

Significant differences in levels of copia [Drosophila long terminal repeat (LTR) retrotransposon] expression exist among six species representing the Drosophila melanogaster species complex (D. melanogaster, Drosophila mauritiana, Drosophila simulans, Drosophila sechellia, Drosophila yakuba, and Drosophila erecta) and a more distantly related species (Drosophila willistoni). These differences in expression are correlated with major size variation mapping to putative regulatory regions of the copia 5' LTR and adjacent untranslated leader region (ULR). Sequence analysis indicates that these size variants were derived from a series of regional duplication events. The ability of the copia LTR-ULR size variants to drive expression of a bacterial chloramphenicol acetyltransferase reporter gene was tested in each of the seven species. The results indicate that both element-encoded (cis) and host-genome-encoded (trans) genetic differences are responsible for the variability in copia expression within and between Drosophila species. This finding indicates that models purporting to explain the dynamics and distribution of retrotransposons in natural populations must consider the potential impact of both element-encoded and host-genome-encoded regulatory variation to be valid. We propose that interelement selection among retrotransposons may provide a molecular drive mechanism for the evolution of eukaryotic enhancers which can be subsequently distributed throughout the genome by retrotransposition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8692951      PMCID: PMC38942          DOI: 10.1073/pnas.93.14.7097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A        ISSN: 0027-8424            Impact factor:   11.205


  32 in total

Review 1.  Transcription and reverse transcription of retrotransposons.

Authors:  J D Boeke; V G Corces
Journal:  Annu Rev Microbiol       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 15.500

Review 2.  Enhancer sequences and the regulation of gene transcription.

Authors:  M M Müller; T Gerster; W Schaffner
Journal:  Eur J Biochem       Date:  1988-10-01

3.  Ty elements transpose through an RNA intermediate.

Authors:  J D Boeke; D J Garfinkel; C A Styles; G R Fink
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1985-03       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  The transcriptional control regions of the copia retrotransposon.

Authors:  A Sneddon; A J Flavell
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  1989-06-12       Impact factor: 16.971

Review 5.  Regulation of inducible and tissue-specific gene expression.

Authors:  T Maniatis; S Goodbourn; J A Fischer
Journal:  Science       Date:  1987-06-05       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  Chromosomal walking and jumping to isolate DNA from the Ace and rosy loci and the bithorax complex in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  W Bender; P Spierer; D S Hogness
Journal:  J Mol Biol       Date:  1983-07-25       Impact factor: 5.469

7.  Terminal repeats of the Drosophila transposable element copia: nucleotide sequence and genomic organization.

Authors:  R Levis; P Dunsmuir; G M Rubin
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1980-09       Impact factor: 41.582

8.  A Drosophila protein that imparts directionality on a chromatin insulator is an enhancer of position-effect variegation.

Authors:  T I Gerasimova; D A Gdula; D V Gerasimov; O Simonova; V G Corces
Journal:  Cell       Date:  1995-08-25       Impact factor: 41.582

9.  Suppression in Drosophila: su(Hw) and su(f) gene products interact with a region of gypsy (mdg4) regulating its transcriptional activity.

Authors:  A M Mazo; L J Mizrokhi; A A Karavanov; Y A Sedkov; A A Krichevskaja; Y V Ilyin
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1989-03       Impact factor: 11.598

10.  Characterization and developmental expression of beta tubulin genes in Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  S Bialojan; D Falkenburg; R Renkawitz-Pohl
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 11.598

View more
  11 in total

1.  Evidence for the recent horizontal transfer of long terminal repeat retrotransposon.

Authors:  I K Jordan; L V Matyunina; J F McDonald
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1999-10-26       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The 5' untranslated region and Gag product of Idefix, a long terminal repeat-retrotransposon from Drosophila melanogaster, act together to initiate a switch between translated and untranslated states of the genomic mRNA.

Authors:  Carine Meignin; Jean-Luc Bailly; Frédérick Arnaud; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 4.272

3.  Intercellular communication between germ line and somatic line is utilized to control the transcription of ZAM, an endogenous retrovirus from Drosophila melanogaster.

Authors:  Carine Meignin; Bernard Dastugue; Chantal Vaury
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-07-19       Impact factor: 16.971

4.  The ribosomal shunt translation strategy of cauliflower mosaic virus has evolved from ancient long terminal repeats.

Authors:  Monir Shababi; June Bourque; Karuppaiah Palanichelvam; Anthony Cole; Dong Xu; Xiu-Feng Wan; James Schoelz
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.103

5.  Copia retrotransposon in the Zaprionus genus: another case of transposable element sharing with the Drosophila melanogaster subgroup.

Authors:  Nathalia de Setta; Marie-Anne Van Sluys; Pierre Capy; Claudia Marcia Aparecida Carareto
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2011-02-24       Impact factor: 2.395

6.  Transcriptional activation of the tobacco retrotransposon Tto1 by wounding and methyl jasmonate.

Authors:  S Takeda; K Sugimoto; H Otsuki; H Hirochika
Journal:  Plant Mol Biol       Date:  1998-02       Impact factor: 4.076

7.  Variability, recombination, and mosaic evolution of the barley BARE-1 retrotransposon.

Authors:  Carlos M Vicient; Ruslan Kalendar; Alan H Schulman
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2005-07-18       Impact factor: 2.395

8.  The transcription factor Xrp1 orchestrates both reduced translation and cell competition upon defective ribosome assembly or function.

Authors:  Marianthi Kiparaki; Chaitali Khan; Virginia Folgado-Marco; Jacky Chuen; Panagiotis Moulos; Nicholas E Baker
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2022-02-18       Impact factor: 8.713

9.  Survey of transcripts in the adult Drosophila brain.

Authors:  K L Posey; L B Jones; R Cerda; M Bajaj; T Huynh; P E Hardin; S H Hardin
Journal:  Genome Biol       Date:  2001-02-21       Impact factor: 13.583

10.  High-level gene expression in Aedes albopictus cells using a baculovirus Hr3 enhancer and IE1 transactivator.

Authors:  Christine E Gray; Craig J Coates
Journal:  BMC Mol Biol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 2.946

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.