Literature DB >> 8692571

[Screw arthrodesis of the ankle joint. Technique and outcome].

H Thermann1, T Hüfner, A Roehler, H Tscherne.   

Abstract

In ankle arthrodeses several clinical and biomechanical studies have shown the superiority of the screw technique over external fixation. As a maximum of stability is a major goal, especially for functional after-treatment or in patients with poor bone stock, the arthrodeses technique at Hannover Medical School is performed with four screws. Two parallel anterior/posterior screws are placed from the tibia to the talus, providing anterior stabilization. One screw posteriomedial has a posterior tension-wiring effect and one screw placed through the fibula to the talus acts against rotational and sagittal translation. From May 1975 to May 1995, 225 ankle arthrodeses with internal or external fixation technique were performed. Complications were found in 47% in the external fixation treatment group (n = 44) and in 10% the patients stabilized with the screw technique (n = 181). Fifty of these 225 patients had a follow-up evaluation after an average of 7.4 years (external fixation, n = 22; screw fixation, n = 28). All patients were examined and scored with three different scoring systems: (1) MHH Score, (2) Clinical Rating System according to Kitaoka et al. (1994) and (3) Outcome Questionnaire for evaluating the overall outcome. The results from the questionnaire were compared to the clinical scores. Retrospective analysis revealed a higher rate of complications for arthrodeses performed by external fixation. The overall results of all three different scoring systems showed a trend in favor of the screw-fixation technique without reaching statistical significance (P > 0.05). The results of the Outcome Questionnaire are statistically as valid as the two clinical scoring systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8692571

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthopade        ISSN: 0085-4530            Impact factor:   1.087


  14 in total

1.  Posttraumatic severe infection of the ankle joint - long term results of the treatment with resection arthrodesis in 133 cases.

Authors:  Benjamin Kienast; J Kiene; J Gille; R Thietje; U Gerlach; A P Schulz
Journal:  Eur J Med Res       Date:  2010-02-26       Impact factor: 2.175

2.  [Reorientational arthrodesis of the ankle joint using four screws].

Authors:  R Grass; S Rammelt; T Endres; H Zwipp
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.087

3.  [The reorientational rearthrodesis of the upper ankle joint following failed arthrodesis].

Authors:  H Zwipp; R Grass; S Rammelt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Three-dimensional analysis of the foot following implantation of a HINTEGRA ankle prosthesis: evaluation with the Heidelberg foot model].

Authors:  S Müller; S Wolf; L Döderlein
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  [Not Available].

Authors:  R Grass; H Zwipp
Journal:  Oper Orthop Traumatol       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 1.154

6.  Comparison between percutaneous and open reduction for treating paediatric talar neck fractures.

Authors:  Xu Zhang; Xinzhong Shao; Yadong Yu; Yingzhe Zhang; Guisheng Zhang; Dehu Tian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.075

7.  High union rates and function scores at midterm followup with ankle arthrodesis using a four screw technique.

Authors:  Hans Zwipp; Stefan Rammelt; Thomas Endres; Jan Heineck
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2009-09-10       Impact factor: 4.176

8.  [Short-term results after STAR total ankle replacement].

Authors:  R Schönherr; S Fuss; M Körbl; C T Trepte; D Parsch
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.087

9.  [Ankle arthrodesis with intramedullary compression nailing].

Authors:  T Mückley; T Schütz; S Srivastava; M Goebel; O Gonschorek; V Bühren
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 10.  [Ankle arthrodesis versus ankle replacement: a comparison].

Authors:  J Jerosch; H Fayaz; H Senyurt
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.087

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.