Literature DB >> 8691284

Comparing comorbid-illness indices assessing outcome variation: the case of prostatectomy.

M A Krousel-Wood1, A Abdoh, R Re.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We investigated and compared the effects of three different comorbid indices on selection of procedure and outcome variation to determine which, if any, could be used for interpreting outcomes data.
DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study.
SETTING: Large multispecialty group practice. PATIENTS: Patients (aged 55-85 years) with residence in the United States who underwent a first-time prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia: 302 total; 253 transurethral procedures (TURF) versus 49 open procedures (OP).
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The following indices were used to assess comorbid disease: Charison index (CI), index of coexistent disease (ICED), and Kaplan-Feinstein index (KFI). The main outcome measure was the five-year mortality rate. The unadjusted five-year mortality rates were 16% (40/ 253) for TURP and 4% (2/49) for OP; survival analysis revealed this difference to be marginally significant at the p = -05 level. In an effort to control for the effect of comorbidity, CI, ICED, and KFI were independently assessed: together with age, they each had similar effects in rendering the risk of death associated with procedure type insignificant. However, comorbidity, as derived with ICED (not CI or KFI), was identified as a confounding variable when assessing the five-year mortality rate after prostatectomy as ICED was associated with the procedure type (predictor variable) and the five-year mortality (outcome variable).
CONCLUSION: Differences in the composition and scoring of comorbid indices may have important implications for interpreting outcomes data. Nevertheless, these results, together with those of previous studies, suggest that the reported increased mortality for patients undergoing TURP is probably due to case-mix differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8691284     DOI: 10.1007/bf02603483

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Gen Intern Med        ISSN: 0884-8734            Impact factor:   5.128


  16 in total

1.  The role of outcomes in quality assessment and assurance.

Authors:  A Donabedian
Journal:  QRB Qual Rev Bull       Date:  1992-11

2.  Severity of comorbidity, not type of surgery, affects outcome of prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Concato; J G Elmore; R I Horwitz; S F Schiff; A R Feinstein
Journal:  Trans Assoc Am Physicians       Date:  1990

3.  Mortality and reoperation after open and transurethral resection of the prostate for benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  N P Roos; J E Wennberg; D J Malenka; E S Fisher; K McPherson; T F Andersen; M M Cohen; E Ramsey
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-04-27       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  The importance of classifying initial co-morbidity in evaluating the outcome of diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  M H Kaplan; A R Feinstein
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1974-09

5.  A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation.

Authors:  M E Charlson; P Pompei; K L Ales; C R MacKenzie
Journal:  J Chronic Dis       Date:  1987

6.  The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 11.105

7.  Flaws in mortality data. The hazards of ignoring comorbid disease.

Authors:  S Greenfield; H U Aronow; R M Elashoff; D Watanabe
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1988-10-21       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  The importance of co-existent disease in the occurrence of postoperative complications and one-year recovery in patients undergoing total hip replacement. Comorbidity and outcomes after hip replacement.

Authors:  S Greenfield; G Apolone; B J McNeil; P D Cleary
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1993-02       Impact factor: 2.983

9.  Problems of comorbidity in mortality after prostatectomy.

Authors:  J Concato; R I Horwitz; A R Feinstein; J G Elmore; S F Schiff
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1992-02-26       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  Patterns of care related to age of breast cancer patients.

Authors:  S Greenfield; D M Blanco; R M Elashoff; P A Ganz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1987 May 22-29       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  5 in total

1.  The next generation of research in provider optimization.

Authors:  S Greenfield
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 5.128

2.  Practical considerations in the measurement of outcomes in healthcare.

Authors:  M A Krousel-Wood
Journal:  Ochsner J       Date:  1999-10

3.  Constructs of burden of illness in older patients with breast cancer: a comparison of measurement methods.

Authors:  J S Mandelblatt; A S Bierman; K Gold; Y Zhang; J H Ng; N Maserejian; N Maserejan; Y T Hwang; N J Meropol; J Hadley; R A Silliman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 3.402

Review 4.  Changing therapeutic regimens in benign prostatic hyperplasia. Clinical and economic considerations.

Authors:  H J Stoevelaar; J McDonnell
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Chronic disease as a barrier to breast and cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  C I Kiefe; E Funkhouser; M N Fouad; D S May
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 5.128

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.