Literature DB >> 8690748

The future of antihormone therapy: innovations based on an established principle.

K Parczyk1, M R Schneider.   

Abstract

Endocrine therapy of mammary and prostate cancer has been established for decades. The therapies available to block sex-hormone-receptor-mediated tumor growth are based on two principles: (i) ligand depletion, which can be achieved surgically, by use of luteinizing-hormone-releasing hormone analogues or inhibitors of enzymes involved in steroid biosynthesis or by interfering with the feedback mechanisms of sex hormone synthesis at the pituitary/hypothalamic level; (ii) blockade of sex hormone receptor function by use of antihormones. The antiestrogen tamoxifen, which is the compound of choice for the treatment of mammary carcinoma, has the drawback of being a partial agonist. A complete blockade of estrogen receptor (ER) function can be achieved by a new class of compounds, pure antiestrogens. In contrast to aromatase inhibitors, pure antiestrogens are able to block ER activation by ligands other than estradiol and can also interfere with ligand-independent ER activation. In addition to estradiol, progesterone has a strong proliferative effect in mammary carcinomas. Antiprogestins are promising new tools for clinical breast cancer therapy. These compounds clearly need a functionally expressed progesterone receptor to block tumor growth, but there is strong experimental evidence that their tumor inhibition is based on more than just progesterone antagonism. The ability of these compounds to induce tumor cell differentiation that leads to apoptosis is unique among all other endocrine therapeutics. In prostate tumors that have relapsed from current androgen-ablation therapies the androgen receptor (AR) is still expressed and, compared to the primary tumors, its level is often even enhanced. Mutated AR that can be activated by other compounds such as adrenal steroids, estrogens, progestins and even antiandrogens have been detected in recurrent tumors. Thus, relapse of tumors under the selective pressure of common androgen-ablation therapies can be caused by acquired androgen hypersensitivity and AR activation by ligands other than (dihydro-)testosterone. There is a clinical need for future compounds that produce a complete blockade of AR activity even in recurrent tumors. Preclinical experiments indicate that combination therapy as well as the extension of endocrine treatments to several other tumor entities are promising approaches for further developments. Examples are the combination of antiestrogens and antiprogestins for breast cancer treatment, or the treatment of prostate carcinomas with antiprogestins.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690748     DOI: 10.1007/bf01212877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol        ISSN: 0171-5216            Impact factor:   4.553


  70 in total

Review 1.  The molecular biology of RU486. Is there a role for antiprogestins in the treatment of breast cancer?

Authors:  K B Horwitz
Journal:  Endocr Rev       Date:  1992-05       Impact factor: 19.871

2.  In vivo evidence against the existence of antiprogestins disrupting receptor binding to DNA.

Authors:  K Delabre; A Guiochon-Mantel; E Milgrom
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-05-15       Impact factor: 11.205

3.  The rat endometrial adenocarcinoma cell line RUCA-I: a novel hormone-responsive in vivo/in vitro tumor model.

Authors:  G Vollmer; M R Schneider
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 4.292

4.  Detection of the apoptosis-suppressing oncoprotein bc1-2 in hormone-refractory human prostate cancers.

Authors:  M Colombel; F Symmans; S Gil; K M O'Toole; D Chopin; M Benson; C A Olsson; S Korsmeyer; R Buttyan
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 4.307

5.  Modulation of the ligand-independent activation of the human estrogen receptor by hormone and antihormone.

Authors:  C L Smith; O M Conneely; B W O'Malley
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-07-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Effects of a non-steroidal pure antioestrogen, ZM 189,154, on oestrogen target organs of the rat including bones.

Authors:  M Dukes; R Chester; L Yarwood; A E Wakeling
Journal:  J Endocrinol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  Enhancement of the antitumor efficacy of the antiprogestin, onapristone, by combination with the antiestrogen, ICI 164384.

Authors:  Y Nishino; M R Schneider; H Michna
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.553

8.  Pharmacological basis for clinical use of antiandrogens.

Authors:  F Neumann
Journal:  J Steroid Biochem       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 4.292

9.  The tumor-inhibiting effect of diethylstilbestrol and its diphosphate on the Nb-H and Nb-R prostatic carcinomas of the rat.

Authors:  M R Schneider; A Humm; A H Graf
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  1990       Impact factor: 4.553

10.  Androgen receptor status in localized and locally progressive hormone refractory human prostate cancer.

Authors:  J A Ruizeveld de Winter; P J Janssen; H M Sleddens; M C Verleun-Mooijman; J Trapman; A O Brinkmann; A B Santerse; F H Schröder; T H van der Kwast
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 4.307

View more
  5 in total

1.  Cucurbitacins are insect steroid hormone antagonists acting at the ecdysteroid receptor.

Authors:  L Dinan; P Whiting; J P Girault; R Lafont; T S Dhadialla; D E Cress; B Mugat; C Antoniewski; J A Lepesant
Journal:  Biochem J       Date:  1997-11-01       Impact factor: 3.857

2.  Hsp90 inhibition: elimination of shock and stress.

Authors:  Adam S Duerfeldt; Brian S J Blagg
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2010-07-01       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  Changes of transthyretin and clusterin after androgen ablation therapy and correlation with prostate cancer malignancy.

Authors:  Daohu Wang; Hui Liang; Xiaopeng Mao; Wei Liu; Mingtao Li; Shaopeng Qiu
Journal:  Transl Oncol       Date:  2012-04-01       Impact factor: 4.243

4.  Proteomic comparison of prostate cancer cell lines LNCaP-FGC and LNCaP-r reveals heatshock protein 60 as a marker for prostate malignancy.

Authors:  Björn Johansson; Mohammad R Pourian; Yin-Choy Chuan; Irene Byman; Anders Bergh; See-Tong Pang; Gunnar Norstedt; Tomas Bergman; Ake Pousette
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 4.104

5.  Path to Clonal Theranostics in Luminal Breast Cancers.

Authors:  Nawale Hajjaji; Soulaimane Aboulouard; Tristan Cardon; Delphine Bertin; Yves-Marie Robin; Isabelle Fournier; Michel Salzet
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-01-13       Impact factor: 6.244

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.