Literature DB >> 8690117

A change in practice: current urologic practice in response to reports concerning vasectomy and prostate cancer.

J I Sandlow1, K J Kreder.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the practice patterns of urologists performing vasectomy in response to studies reporting an increased risk of prostate cancer in vasectomized men.
DESIGN: A mailed survey.
SETTING: A university medical institution. PARTICIPANTS: One thousand five hundred randomly selected United States urologists under the age of 65 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Urologists reported practice patterns of vasectomy in response to studies showing possible link between vasectomy and prostate cancer.
RESULTS: A response rate of 51% (759/1,500) was obtained. Although > 90% state that these studies have had little or no effect upon their practice of vasectomy, 27% screen vasectomized men earlier for prostate cancer, and 20% would be reluctant to recommend a vasectomy to a man with a strong family history of prostate cancer.
CONCLUSIONS: Over one fourth of urologists who screen for prostate cancer have altered their screening patterns even though they responded that the studies have not affected their practice patterns.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8690117     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(16)58454-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  2 in total

1.  Vasectomy and prostate cancer.

Authors:  Masood A Khan; Alan W Partin
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2004

2.  Vasectomy in the United States, 1991 and 1995.

Authors:  R J Magnani; J M Haws; G T Morgan; P M Gargiullo; A E Pollack; L M Koonin
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  1999-01       Impact factor: 9.308

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.