Literature DB >> 8689217

No obvious advantages for thoracoscopic two-stage oesophagectomy.

G S Robertson1, D M Lloyd, A C Wicks, P S Veitch.   

Abstract

Thoracoscopically assisted Ivor-Lewis oesophagectomy potentially combines the pulmonary advantages of transhiatal oesophageal dissection, with the visibility and control permitted by thoracotomy. This study reviewed 17 patients who underwent this procedure with an intrathoracic anastomosis. Five patients required conversion to thoracotomy, four because of technical difficulties with the anastomosis. After operation 13 patients had radiological evidence of atelectasis, six developed a left pleural effusion and five had clinically significant pneumonia. Three patients developed an anastomotic leak, two of whom died giving an in-hospital mortality rate of 12 per cent. Median postoperative hospital stay was 12 days. Four patients developed benign anastomotic strictures requiring dilatation. The 1- and 2-year survival rates were 73 per cent (11 of 15 patients) and 63 per cent (five of eight) respectively. The use of minimal access techniques in this context does not appear to reduce the postoperative incidence of either pulmonary or anastomotic complications.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8689217     DOI: 10.1002/bjs.1800830527

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  20 in total

Review 1.  Thoracoscopic esophagectomy in the prone position.

Authors:  Omar A Jarral; Sanjay Purkayastha; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi; George B Hanna; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-03-07       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Video-assisted thoracic surgery--the past, present status and the future.

Authors:  Shi-ping Luh; Hui-ping Liu
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Robotic-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy.

Authors:  Carsten N Gutt; Vasile V Bintintan; Jörg Köninger; Beat P Müller-Stich; Michael Reiter; Markus W Büchler
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 3.445

Review 4.  Minimally invasive oesophagectomy: current status and future direction.

Authors:  Nick Butler; Stuart Collins; Breda Memon; Muhammed Ashraf Memon
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-02-07       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Kohei Nakata; Eishi Nagai; Kenoki Ohuchida; Katsuya Nakamura; Masao Tanaka
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Laparoscopic esophagectomy in the palliative treatment of advanced esophageal cancer after radiochemotherapy.

Authors:  A Del Genio; G Rossetti; V Napolitano; V Maffettone; A Renzi; L Brusciano; G Russo; G Del Genio
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-10-26       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Results of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery for esophageal cancer during the induction period.

Authors:  Itasu Ninomiya; Harushi Osugi; Takashi Fujimura; Masato Kayahara; Hiroyuki Takamura; Masashi Takemura; Shigeru Lee; Hisatoshi Nakagawara; Genichi Nishimura; Tetsuo Ohta
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2008-03-14

Review 8.  Rationale for video-assisted radical esophagectomy.

Authors:  Harushi Udagawa; Masaki Ueno; Yoshihiro Kinoshita
Journal:  Gen Thorac Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2009-03-12

9.  Mediastinoscope-assisted transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  A Tangoku; S Yoshino; T Abe; H Hayashi; T Satou; T Ueno; M Oka
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-01-23       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  Thoracoscopic resection for esophageal cancer: A review of literature.

Authors:  Joris J G Scheepers; Donald L van der Peet; Alexander A F A Veenhof; Miguel A Cuesta
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.407

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.