Literature DB >> 25582767

Outcomes of cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Kohei Nakata1, Eishi Nagai, Kenoki Ohuchida, Katsuya Nakamura, Masao Tanaka.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy has been performed with a variety of techniques during the past decade. However, anastomotic leakage and stricture are still important clinical problems after esophagogastric anastomosis, causing burdensome symptoms and poor quality of life. Herein, we describe a novel cervical end-to-side triangulating esophagogastric anastomoasis using linear stapler.
METHODS: A total of 90 patients (85 % male; mean age 63 years) with thoracic esophageal cancer who underwent cervical end-to-side esophagogastric triangular anastomosis using a linear stapler after minimally invasive esophagectomy between November 2006 and April 2013 were retrospectively reviewed.
RESULTS: The median operation time was 602 min (range 424-936 min). The volume of blood loss during the entire operative procedure was 127 ml (range 0-700 ml). There were no cases of anastomotic leakage in this study, although four patients (4.4 %) developed dysphagia associated with benign anastomotic stricture formation. All patients with a benign anastomotic stricture underwent balloon dilation, which resulted in improvement in their symptoms.
CONCLUSIONS: Considering the absence of anastomotic leakage and low rate of anastomotic stricture formation in this study, our modified triangular esophagogastric anastomosis technique appears promising and may contribute to reduced morbidity and mortality rates following esophagectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25582767     DOI: 10.1007/s00268-014-2925-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  World J Surg        ISSN: 0364-2313            Impact factor:   3.352


  24 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 2.  Should oesophagectomy be performed with cervical or intrathoracic anastomosis?

Authors:  Babar Kayani; Omar A Jarral; Thanos Athanasiou; Emmanouil Zacharakis
Journal:  Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg       Date:  2012-02-24

3.  End-to-end cervical esophagogastric anastomoses are associated with a higher number of strictures compared with end-to-side anastomoses.

Authors:  Leonie Haverkamp; Pieter C van der Sluis; Roy J J Verhage; Peter D Siersema; Jelle P Ruurda; Richard van Hillegersberg
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-02-12       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  An early experience using the technique of transoral OrVil EEA stapler for minimally invasive transthoracic esophagectomy.

Authors:  Dawn E Jaroszewski; Dustin G Williams; David E Fleischer; Helen J Ross; Yvonne Romero; Kristi L Harold
Journal:  Ann Thorac Surg       Date:  2011-09-25       Impact factor: 4.330

5.  Comparison of hand-sewn and stapled esophagogastric anastomosis after esophageal resection for cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  S Law; M Fok; K M Chu; J Wong
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 6.  Hand-sewn versus mechanical esophagogastric anastomosis after esophagectomy: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michitaka Honda; Akira Kuriyama; Hisashi Noma; Souya Nunobe; Toshi A Furukawa
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Endoscopic and symptomatic assessment of anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy and cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  V A Williams; T J Watson; S Zhovtis; O Gellersen; D Raymond; C Jones; J H Peters
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Gastric microcirculatory changes during gastric tube formation: assessment with laser Doppler flowmetry.

Authors:  M K Schilling; C Redaelli; C Maurer; H Friess; M W Büchler
Journal:  J Surg Res       Date:  1996-04       Impact factor: 2.192

9.  Endoscopic laser therapy for malignancies affecting the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction. Analysis of technical and functional efficacy.

Authors:  M H Mellow; H Pinkas
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-08

10.  Histamine-2 receptor antagonists vs proton pump inhibitors on gastrointestinal tract hemorrhage and infectious complications in the intensive care unit.

Authors:  Robert MacLaren; Paul M Reynolds; Richard R Allen
Journal:  JAMA Intern Med       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 21.873

View more
  4 in total

1.  Calcification of arteries supplying the gastric tube increases the risk of anastomotic leakage after esophagectomy with cervical anastomosis.

Authors:  Liang Zhao; Gefei Zhao; Jiagen Li; Bin Qu; Susheng Shi; Xiaoli Feng; Hao Feng; Jun Jiang; Qi Xue; Jie He
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Comparison of circular stapling, triangulating stapling and T-shape stapling for cervical anastomosis with minimally invasive esophagectomy.

Authors:  Yu Tian; Lin Li; Shuhai Li; Hui Tian; Ming Lu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2020-12

3.  Stapled versus hand-sewn cervical esophagogastric anastomosis in patients undergoing esophagectomy: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Pramod Kumar Mishra; Harsh Shah; Nikhil Gupta; Vaibhav Varshney; Nilesh Sadashiv Patil; Amit Jain; Sundeep Singh Saluja
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2016-01-04

4.  Triple-stapled quadrilateral anastomosis: a new technique for creation of an esophagogastric anastomosis.

Authors:  Yuji Ishibashi; Tetsu Fukunaga; Shinya Mikami; Shinichi Oka; Satoshi Kanda; Yukinori Yube; Yoshinori Kohira; Takeharu Enomoto; Takehito Otsubo
Journal:  Esophagus       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.230

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.