Literature DB >> 8689165

Prospective study of the proctographic and functional consequences of transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

A K Banerjee1, E C Jehle, M E Kreis, U G Schott, C D Claussen, H D Becker, M Starlinger, G F Buess.   

Abstract

A prospective study of clinical, manometric and proctographic results in 36 patients presenting for transanal endoscopic microsurgery was performed. Anorectal manometry showed no difference in maximal squeeze pressure before and 12 months after operation, but resting pressures were lower after surgery (mean(s.e.m.) preoperative 86.1(27.6) mmHg versus postoperative 67.2(23.2) mmHg, P < 0.05). The rectoanal inhibitory reflex was lost in a significant group of patients (reflex present in 34 of 36 patients before operation and in 27 of 36 12 months after operation, P < 0.05). Proctography, manometry and questionnaire showed preserved function of most modalities 12 months after operation such that if objective function was impaired clinical function was adequate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8689165

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Surg        ISSN: 0007-1323            Impact factor:   6.939


  15 in total

1.  UltraCision or high-frequency knife in transanal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM)? Advantages of a new procedure.

Authors:  C Langer; P Markus; T Liersch; L Füzesi; H Becker
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-03-13       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Functional and clinical results of transanal endoscopic microsurgery combined with endoscopic posterior mesorectum resection for the treatment of patients with t1 rectal cancer.

Authors:  Piotr Walega; Jakub Kenig; Piotr Richter; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 3.352

3.  Functional results after laparoscopic rectopexy for rectal prolapse.

Authors:  T T Zittel; K Manncke; S Haug; J F Schäfer; M E Kreis; H D Becker; E C Jehle
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2000 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Systematic review of functional outcomes and quality of life after transanal endoscopic microsurgery and transanal minimally invasive surgery: a word of caution.

Authors:  Franco G Marinello; Anna Curell; Ingrid Tapiolas; Gianluca Pellino; Francesc Vallribera; Eloy Espin
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  2019-11-25       Impact factor: 2.571

5.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgical excision of rectal tumors: indications and results.

Authors:  N Demartines; M O von Flüe; F H Harder
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Anorectal functional results after transanal endoscopic microsurgery in benign and early malignant tumors.

Authors:  Zhiming Jin; Lu Yin; Lijun Xue; Moubin Lin; Qi Zheng
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.352

7.  Low rectal cancer: Sphincter preserving techniques-selection of patients, techniques and outcomes.

Authors:  Nikoletta Dimitriou; Othon Michail; Dimitrios Moris; John Griniatsos
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Oncol       Date:  2015-07-15

8.  Anorectal functional outcome after repeated transanal endoscopic microsurgery.

Authors:  Hong-Wei Zhang; Xiao-Dong Han; Yu Wang; Pin Zhang; Zhi-Ming Jin
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2012-10-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 9.  Transanal endoscopic microsurgery: a review.

Authors:  Behrouz Heidary; Terry P Phang; Manoj J Raval; Carl J Brown
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2014-04       Impact factor: 2.089

10.  Trans-anal minimally invasive surgery (TAMIS) versus trans-anal endoscopic microsurgery (TEM): a comparative case-control matched-pairs analysis.

Authors:  Francesco Stipa; Simone Maria Tierno; Giulia Russo; Antonio Burza
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2021-04-12       Impact factor: 4.584

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.