Literature DB >> 8688292

Outcome analysis of carotid endarterectomy in Connecticut: the impact of volume and specialty.

S T Ruby1, D Robinson, J T Lynch, H Mark.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to define the relationship between the surgeon's operative experience and specialty and the postoperative morbidity and mortality of carotid endarterectomy. All patients undergoing carotid endarterectomy (code ICD-9CM 38.12) in Connecticut between October 1985 and September 1991 were retrospectively identified. A total of 3997 carotid endarterectomies were performed by 226 surgeons in four specialties: general, cardiac, vascular, and neurosurgery. Individual surgeon volume ranged from fewer than one per year to 27.5 per year (mean 2.9 carotid endarterectomies per year). Outcome was measured as a combined stroke and/or death percentage. The average combined stroke and/or death rate for the entire group was 4.9%. The combined stroke and/or death percentage was influenced significantly by the surgeon's annual volume. Surgeons who performed one or fewer carotid endarterectomies (43% of total surgeons) were 2.5 times more likely (p < 0.002) to have a poor postoperative outcome than those who performed 10 or more per year (9.3% of total surgeons). Overall there was a statistically significant correlation between a surgeon's annual volume and outcome, particularly for general surgeons.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8688292     DOI: 10.1007/BF02002337

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg        ISSN: 0890-5096            Impact factor:   1.466


  10 in total

1.  Relation of surgical volume to outcome in eight common operations: results from the VA National Surgical Quality Improvement Program.

Authors:  S F Khuri; J Daley; W Henderson; K Hur; M Hossain; D Soybel; K W Kizer; J B Aust; R H Bell; V Chong; J Demakis; P J Fabri; J O Gibbs; F Grover; K Hammermeister; G McDonald; E Passaro; L Phillips; F Scamman; J Spencer; J F Stremple
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 2.  Teaching procedural skills.

Authors:  T E Norris; S W Cullison; S D Fihn
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Clinical Outcome of Carotid Artery Stenting According to Provider Specialty and Volume.

Authors:  Ali F AbuRahma; John E Campbell; Nizar Hariri; Joseph AbuRahma; L Scott Dean; Mark C Bates; Aravinda Nanjundappa; Patrick A Stone; Ace O'vil
Journal:  Ann Vasc Surg       Date:  2017-05-08       Impact factor: 1.466

Review 4.  A review of simulation training and new 3D computer-generated synthetic organs for robotic surgery education.

Authors:  Daniel M Costello; Isabel Huntington; Grace Burke; Brooke Farrugia; Andrea J O'Connor; Anthony J Costello; Benjamin C Thomas; Philip Dundee; Ahmed Ghazi; Niall Corcoran
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2021-09-03

5.  Population-based review of the outcomes following hepatic resection in a Canadian health region.

Authors:  Elijah Dixon; Oliver F Bathe; Andrew McKay; Isabelle You; Scot Dowden; David Sadler; Kelly W Burak; J Gregory McKinnon; Walter Miller; Francis R Sutherland
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.089

Review 6.  Carotid angioplasty and stenting: new horizons.

Authors:  C R Gomez
Journal:  Curr Atheroscler Rep       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 5.967

7.  Technical errors and complications in orthopaedic trauma surgery.

Authors:  M A Meeuwis; M A C de Jongh; J A Roukema; F H W M van der Heijden; M H J Verhofstad
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2015-12-21       Impact factor: 3.067

8.  Impact of Surgeon Experience During Carotid Endarterectomy Operation and Effects on Perioperative Outcomes.

Authors:  Volkan Yüksel; Ahmet Coskun Ozdemir; Serhat Huseyin; Orkut Guclu; Fatma Nesrin Turan; Suat Canbaz
Journal:  Braz J Cardiovasc Surg       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

9.  High Operator and Hospital Volume Are Associated With a Decreased Risk of Death and Stroke After Carotid Revascularization: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Authors:  Michiel H F Poorthuis; Eelco C Brand; Alison Halliday; Richard Bulbulia; Michiel L Bots; Gert J de Borst
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 12.969

Review 10.  Asymptomatic Carotid Stenosis: Intervention or Best Medical Therapy?

Authors:  Kamran Gaba; Peter A Ringleb; Alison Halliday
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2018-09-24       Impact factor: 5.081

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.