Literature DB >> 8687263

Computer reminders to implement preventive care guidelines for hospitalized patients.

J M Overhage1, W M Tierney, C J McDonald.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Hospitalizations are an opportunity to provide preventive care.
OBJECTIVE: To determine if computer reminders, which we have shown to be effective in our ambulatory care setting, increasing the provision of inpatient preventive care.
METHODS: Randomized, controlled trial on the general medicine inpatient service of an urban, university-affiliated public hospital. Study subjects were 78 house staff rotating on the 6 general medicine services. The intervention was reminders to physicians printed on daily rounds reports about preventive care for which their patients were eligible, and suggested orders for preventive care provided through the physicians' workstations. The preventive care guidelines were derived from the US Preventive Care Task Force recommendations. Compliance with preventive care guidelines and house staff attitudes toward providing preventive care to hospitalized patients were the main outcome measures.
RESULTS: No significant differences were seen between intervention and control physicians in compliance with preventive care guidelines in the aggregate or when individual preventive care actions individual preventive care actions were analyzed. This was true even though most physicians endorsed providing most kinds of preventive care for hospitalized patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite past success in increasing preventive care in the outpatient setting, we were unable, using a moderately intensive intervention, to increase the provision of preventive care during hospitalizations. The physicians providing care during the hospitalization were not the patients' primary care physicians, which proved to be an important barrier. More intensive interventions, or more direct linkages between inpatient and outpatient care providers, may be required to overcome this resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8687263

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Intern Med        ISSN: 0003-9926


  40 in total

Review 1.  Computer-based guideline implementation systems: a systematic review of functionality and effectiveness.

Authors:  R N Shiffman; Y Liaw; C A Brandt; G J Corb
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  1999 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 2.  Considering clustering: a methodological review of clinical decision support system studies.

Authors:  J H Chuang; G Hripcsak; R A Jenders
Journal:  Proc AMIA Symp       Date:  2000

3.  Design and analysis of controlled trials in naturally clustered environments: implications for medical informatics.

Authors:  Jen-Hsiang Chuang; George Hripcsak; Daniel F Heitjan
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2002 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.497

Review 4.  Changing clinical practice through patient specific reminders available at the time of the clinical encounter: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Tim A Holt; Margaret Thorogood; Frances Griffiths
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 5.  Clinical decision support provided within physician order entry systems: a systematic review of features effective for changing clinician behavior.

Authors:  Kensaku Kawamoto; David F Lobach
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2003

6.  Health information technology and physician career satisfaction.

Authors:  Keith T Elder; Jacqueline C Wiltshire; Ronica N Rooks; Rhonda Belue; Lisa C Gary
Journal:  Perspect Health Inf Manag       Date:  2010-09-01

7.  Flying blind: using a digital dashboard to navigate a complex PACS environment.

Authors:  Matthew B Morgan; Barton F Branstetter; Jonathan Mates; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 4.056

8.  Impact of an evidence-based computerized decision support system on primary care prescription costs.

Authors:  S Troy McMullin; Thomas P Lonergan; Charles S Rynearson; Thomas D Doerr; Paul A Veregge; Edward S Scanlan
Journal:  Ann Fam Med       Date:  2004 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.166

9.  The radiology digital dashboard: effects on report turnaround time.

Authors:  Matthew B Morgan; Barton F Branstetter; David M Lionetti; Jeremy S Richardson; Paul J Chang
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2007-03-03       Impact factor: 4.056

10.  Effects of computerized guidelines for managing heart disease in primary care.

Authors:  William M Tierney; J Marc Overhage; Michael D Murray; Lisa E Harris; Xiao-Hua Zhou; George J Eckert; Faye E Smith; Nancy Nienaber; Clement J McDonald; Fredric D Wolinsky
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.128

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.