Literature DB >> 8685325

Positive predictive value of breast biopsy performed as a result of mammography: there is no abrupt change at age 50 years.

D B Kopans1, R H Moore, K A McCarthy, D A Hall, C A Hulka, G J Whitman, P J Slanetz, E F Halpern.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine if the positive predictive value (PPV) of a biopsy initiated because of an abnormal mammogram changes abruptly at age 50 years.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: The PPV and its variation with age was analyzed for 4,778 women who underwent biopsy for a clinically occult abnormality detected at mammography. The relationship of the results to the patient's age was analyzed with age represented as a continuous and two-categorized (< 50, > 50) measure. The latter measure represented an abrupt change, which distinguished those aged 49 years and younger from those aged 50 years and over. With this measure, the patients in each of the two age groups were statistically indistinguishable.
RESULTS: The results were consistent with a steady increase in PPV and the yield of cancers with age, and there was no abrupt change at age 50 years. The modeled PPV for all cancers for these 4,778 patients was approximately 12% for women aged 40 years and increased to 46% by age 79 years.
CONCLUSION: The PPV did not change abruptly at any age for women aged 40-79 years but increased steadily, which reflects the prior probability of breast cancer at each age. Inappropriate grouping of data can lead to misinterpretation of results. Screening guidelines should not be predicated on the false assumption that this variable changes at age 50 years.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8685325     DOI: 10.1148/radiology.200.2.8685325

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  5 in total

1.  Presentation of similar images as a reference for distinction between benign and malignant masses on mammograms: analysis of initial observer study.

Authors:  Chisako Muramatsu; Robert A Schmidt; Junji Shiraishi; Qiang Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  J Digit Imaging       Date:  2010-01-07       Impact factor: 4.056

2.  Scintimammography--a new tool for breast cancer diagnosis.

Authors:  I J Khalkhali; L Diggles
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1996-11

3.  Is surgical management compromised in elderly patients with breast cancer?

Authors:  H J Wanebo; B Cole; M Chung; M Vezeridis; B Schepps; J Fulton; K Bland
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1997-05       Impact factor: 12.969

4.  Logical Differential Prediction Bayes Net, improving breast cancer diagnosis for older women.

Authors:  Houssam Nassif; Yirong Wu; David Page; Elizabeth Burnside
Journal:  AMIA Annu Symp Proc       Date:  2012-11-03

5.  Predicting invasive breast cancer versus DCIS in different age groups.

Authors:  Mehmet U S Ayvaci; Oguzhan Alagoz; Jagpreet Chhatwal; Alejandro Munoz del Rio; Edward A Sickles; Houssam Nassif; Karla Kerlikowske; Elizabeth S Burnside
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2014-08-11       Impact factor: 4.430

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.