Literature DB >> 8683784

Semen analysis in young men with varicocele: preliminary study.

D A Paduch1, J Niedzielski.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Our aim was to determine whether the deleterious effect of varicocele on spermatogenesis, as reflected by semen analysis, occurs in boys as young as 17 to 19 years. Data analysis was done of semen variables of select boys attending randomly chosen schools.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: A total of 36 healthy boys without a pathological condition detected by history, physical examination and scrotal ultrasound served as controls, and 38 with profound varicocele who were otherwise healthy served as an experimental group. All boys were followed as outpatients 2 times during the last year. We performed semen and clinical examinations, Doppler ultrasound assessment of venous reflux, and ultrasound measurement of testicular and pampiniform vein diameters.
RESULTS: No significant differences were found in sperm concentration, volume, presence of spontaneous agglutination and pH between the 2 groups. There were significant differences in total and progressive sperm motility and vitality, which were lower in boys with varicocele, as were the number of normal sperm forms. There was a statistically and clinically significant linear negative relationship between sperm motility, and maximal and basal blood flow velocities as well as pampiniform vein diameter.
CONCLUSIONS: Varicocele can affect spermatogenesis in boys as young as 17 to 19 years, as shown by the decrease in motility, vitality and number of normal forms of spermatozoons. The clinically significant correlations between semen analysis parameters and ultrasound findings allow the prediction of testicular function using ultrasound alone.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683784     DOI: 10.1097/00005392-199608001-00063

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  16 in total

Review 1.  The genetic and phenotypic basis of infertility in men with pediatric urologic disorders.

Authors:  Michael H Hsieh; Adam Hollander; Dolores J Lamb; Paul J Turek
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 2.649

2.  Varicocele in adolescence: where are we now?

Authors:  Laura S Merriman; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Current management of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  D A Paduch; S J Skoog
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2001

4.  Evaluation of testicular catch-up growth in adolescent microsurgical varicocelectomy.

Authors:  Fevzi Bedir; Ercüment Keskin; Mehmet Karabakan; İbrahim Karabulut; Fatih Kürşat Yılmazel; Ertuğrul Gazi Özbey; Yılmaz Aksoy; İsa Özbey
Journal:  Turk J Urol       Date:  2017-05-03

Review 5.  The dilemma of adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Michael L Garcia-Roig; Andrew J Kirsch
Journal:  Pediatr Surg Int       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.827

Review 6.  Varicoceles in the pediatric population: Diagnosis, treatment, and outcomes.

Authors:  Thomas de Los Reyes; Jennifer Locke; Kourosh Afshar
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  The hemodynamic approach to evaluating adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Marcello Cimador; Marco Castagnetti; Ignazio Gattuccio; Marco Pensabene; Maria Sergio; Enrico De Grazia
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2012-03-27       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 8.  Best practice in the diagnosis and treatment of varicocele in children and adolescents.

Authors:  Matthew R Macey; Ryan C Owen; Sherry S Ross; R Matthew Coward
Journal:  Ther Adv Urol       Date:  2018-06-22

Review 9.  Current management of the adolescent varicocele.

Authors:  Patricio C Gargollo; David A Diamond
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 3.092

10.  [Varicocele in adolescents].

Authors:  K Czeloth; T Kälble; S Kliesch
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.