Literature DB >> 8683264

Recurrent cerebral arteriovenous malformations after negative postoperative angiograms.

A Kader1, J T Goodrich, W J Sonstein, B M Stein, P W Carmel, W J Michelsen.   

Abstract

Angiography has been considered to be the gold standard to judge the success of treatment for cerebral arteriovenous malformations (AVMs). Patients without residual nidus or early draining veins on postoperative angiograms are considered cured, with the risk of hemorrhage eliminated. A series of five patients with recurrent AVMs after negative postoperative angiography is described. All patients had hemispheric AVMs, presented initially with hemorrhage, and were between 5 and 13 years of age. Recurrence was noted 1 to 9 years later (at 12-16 years of age); after a hemorrhage in three patients, seizures in one, and on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging in one. Four patients underwent angiography that showed recurrence of the AVM at or adjacent to the original site. Three years postsurgery, the fifth patient died from a large intracerebral and intraventricular hemorrhage originating in the previous location of the AVM; however, the patient did not undergo angiography at the time of recurrence. The initial negative angiograms obtained postoperatively in these patients may be explained by postoperative spasm or thrombosis of a small residual malformation. However, in the authors' cumulative experience with 808 patients who have undergone complete surgical removal of AVMs (of whom 667 were older than 18 years of age), no case of recurrent AVM has been observed in an adult. Therefore, actual regrowth of an AVM may occur in children and could be a consequence of their relatively immature cerebral vasculature and may involve active angiogenesis mediated by humoral factors. The present findings argue against the assumption that AVMs are strictly congenital lesions resulting from failure of capillary formation during early embryogenesis. It is concluded that delayed imaging studies should be considered in children at least 1 year after their initial negative postoperative arteriogram to exclude a recurrent AVM.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8683264     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1996.85.1.0014

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  40 in total

1.  Spontaneous obliteration of pial arteriovenous malformations: a review of 27 cases.

Authors:  M C Patel; T J Hodgson; A A Kemeny; D M Forster
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Molecular, Cellular, and Genetic Determinants of Sporadic Brain Arteriovenous Malformations.

Authors:  Brian P Walcott; Ethan A Winkler; Guy A Rouleau; Michael T Lawton
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 4.654

3.  Pediatric arteriovenous malformation: University of Toronto experience using stereotactic radiosurgery.

Authors:  Gelareh Zadeh; Yuri M Andrade-Souza; May N Tsao; Daryl Scora; Derek Armstrong; Robin Humphreys; James Rutka; James Drake; Peter Dirks; Michael L Schwartz
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2006-11-18       Impact factor: 1.475

4.  Clinico-radiological outcomes following gamma knife radiosurgery for pediatric arteriovenous malformations.

Authors:  Je Young Yeon; Hyung Jin Shin; Jong-Soo Kim; Seung-Chyul Hong; Jung-Il Lee
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2011-02-01       Impact factor: 1.475

5.  Increased expression of ephrin A1 in brain arteriovenous malformation: DNA microarray analysis.

Authors:  Atsushi Sasahara; Hidetoshi Kasuya; Hiroyuki Akagawa; Hiroshi Ujiie; Osami Kubo; Toshiyuki Sasaki; Hideaki Onda; Yoshiko Sakamoto; Boris Krischek; Tomokatsu Hori; Ituro Inoue
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2007-06-19       Impact factor: 3.042

6.  Comparison of 2 approaches for determining the natural history risk of brain arteriovenous malformation rupture.

Authors:  Helen Kim; Charles E McCulloch; S Claiborne Johnston; Michael T Lawton; Stephen Sidney; William L Young
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2010-05-14       Impact factor: 4.897

Review 7.  De novo cerebral arteriovenous malformation: case report and literature review.

Authors:  J Stevens; J L Leach; T Abruzzo; B V Jones
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

8.  Case report of a de novo brainstem arteriovenous malformation in an 18-year-old male and review of the literature.

Authors:  Kent J Kilbourn; Gary Spiegel; Brendan D Killory; Inam Kureshi
Journal:  Neurosurg Rev       Date:  2014-07-04       Impact factor: 3.042

9.  Intrarater and interrater reliability of the pediatric arteriovenous malformation compactness score in children.

Authors:  Fabio A Frisoli; Shih-Shan Lang; Arastoo Vossough; Anne Marie Cahill; Gregory G Heuer; Hisham M Dahmoush; Phillip B Storm; Lauren A Beslow
Journal:  J Neurosurg Pediatr       Date:  2013-03-15       Impact factor: 2.375

10.  Recurrent cerebral arteriovenous malformation in a child : case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Yong-Sook Park; Jeong-Taik Kwon
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2009-06-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.