Literature DB >> 8681927

Influence of two different modes of resistance training in female subjects.

H Hisaeda1, K Miyagawa, S Kuno, T Fukunaga, I Muraoka.   

Abstract

In resistance training, it has been empirically accepted that muscle hypertrophy is developed by low intensity and high volume training, while muscle strength and power are developed by high intensity and low volume training. The purpose of the present study was to investigate the influence of two different modes of resistance training on isokinetic strength and muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) in females. Eleven females, who had no experience in resistance training, participated in this study and were randomly divided into two groups. The former consisted of 4-5 sets of 15-20 RM (repetition maximum) with sufficient rest between sets (Group H), while the latter consisted of 8-9 sets of 4-6R M with 90 s of rest between sets (Group S). The former was assumed to be appropriate for muscle hypertrophy and the latter muscle strength, respectively. All subjects completed isotonic knee extension exercise three times a week for 8 weeks. Measurements were made on quadriceps muscle cross-sectional area (CSA) and isokinetic torques at 0, 60, 180, and approximately 300 degrees before training, at the fifth week and the end of training period. Muscle CSA was defined as the sum of CSA measured at 30, 50 and 70% of femur length. After training, muscle CSA had significantly increased in both groups: 3.3 +/- 0.7% (p < .05) for group H and 3.6 +/- 1.1% (p < .05) for group S, respectively. While the changes in isokinetic torque were 43.4 +/- 47.5% (p < .05) for group H and 27.4 +/- 31.3% (p < .05) for group S, respectively. In both groups the percentage changes of the isokinetic strength were significantly higher than those of the CSA. No significant difference in these variables were found between the two groups. These results suggest that during the early phase of resistance training two different modes of resistance training may have similar effects on muscle CSA and isokinetic strength in untrained females.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1996        PMID: 8681927     DOI: 10.1080/00140139608964505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ergonomics        ISSN: 0014-0139            Impact factor:   2.778


  7 in total

1.  Is glucose/amino acid supplementation after exercise an aid to strength training?

Authors:  A G Williams; M van den Oord; A Sharma; D A Jones
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 2.  Berger in retrospect: effect of varied weight training programmes on strength.

Authors:  R N Carpinelli
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 13.800

Review 3.  Intramuscular Anabolic Signaling and Endocrine Response Following Resistance Exercise: Implications for Muscle Hypertrophy.

Authors:  Adam M Gonzalez; Jay R Hoffman; Jeffrey R Stout; David H Fukuda; Darryn S Willoughby
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 11.136

Review 4.  The influence of frequency, intensity, volume and mode of strength training on whole muscle cross-sectional area in humans.

Authors:  Mathias Wernbom; Jesper Augustsson; Roland Thomeé
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 11.136

5.  Author's reply to Steele and Fisher: "Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?": the importance of maintaining objectivity in drawing evidence-based conclusions.

Authors:  B Schoenfeld
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

6.  Scientific rigour: a heavy or light load to carry?

Authors:  James Steele; James Fisher
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 11.136

7.  The effects of supramaximal versus submaximal intensity eccentric training when performed until volitional fatigue.

Authors:  Joel R Krentz; Philip D Chilibeck; Jonathan P Farthing
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 3.078

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.