BASIC PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVE OF STUDY: Patient-satisfaction is an important part of the quality of results of medical treatment in hospital. Such satisfaction can be measured with a standardised multi-dimensional questionnaire which takes into account all relevant parts of a hospital. An enquiry was undertaken on patients in a university department of urology to find out whether a scientifically based measurement of patient-satisfaction is possible and whether organisational improvement can result from it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dimensions of patients-satisfaction included "care by doctors", "care by nursing staff", "food and accommodation", and "administration and daily activity". A questionnaire with a scale for answers (total of 65 items with closed answers) was developed for each of the dimensions. A one-month pretest served to ascertain acceptance and understanding of the questionnaire. In the three-month main test period questionnaires were given to all in-patients over 16 years old on admission. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS: 232 patients took part (172 men, 60 women; median age 57 years), a response rate of 61%. The scales were shown to have a high internal consistency. The answers provided, for example, the means for simple and directly applicable improvement in patient information and the organisation of daily routine. Making the results known had a positive effect on the motivation of the staff. CONCLUSION: The work and cost involved in such a study are reasonable. This is the more so since in future investigation on patient-satisfaction will be undertaken every year or two as part of the demanded quality management in hospitals. However, scientific principles in the methodology must be taken into account when evaluating the results.
BASIC PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVE OF STUDY: Patient-satisfaction is an important part of the quality of results of medical treatment in hospital. Such satisfaction can be measured with a standardised multi-dimensional questionnaire which takes into account all relevant parts of a hospital. An enquiry was undertaken on patients in a university department of urology to find out whether a scientifically based measurement of patient-satisfaction is possible and whether organisational improvement can result from it. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Dimensions of patients-satisfaction included "care by doctors", "care by nursing staff", "food and accommodation", and "administration and daily activity". A questionnaire with a scale for answers (total of 65 items with closed answers) was developed for each of the dimensions. A one-month pretest served to ascertain acceptance and understanding of the questionnaire. In the three-month main test period questionnaires were given to all in-patients over 16 years old on admission. Participation was voluntary and anonymous. RESULTS: 232 patients took part (172 men, 60 women; median age 57 years), a response rate of 61%. The scales were shown to have a high internal consistency. The answers provided, for example, the means for simple and directly applicable improvement in patient information and the organisation of daily routine. Making the results known had a positive effect on the motivation of the staff. CONCLUSION: The work and cost involved in such a study are reasonable. This is the more so since in future investigation on patient-satisfaction will be undertaken every year or two as part of the demanded quality management in hospitals. However, scientific principles in the methodology must be taken into account when evaluating the results.