M H Kollef1. 1. Pulmonary and Critical Care Division, Department of Internal Medicine, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO 63110, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of private attending physician status on the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions among patients dying within a medical intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: An academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-nine consecutive patient deaths occurring in the medical ICU during a 12-month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions (i.e., mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and/or vasopressors), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, medical care costs, and patient charges were recorded. Life sustaining interventions were actively withdrawn from 69 (43.4%) patients prior to death. Patients without a private attending physician were significantly more likely to undergo the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions compared with patients having a private attending physician (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence interval = 1.8, 3.6, respectively; p = .005). A correlation was found between the possession of private health insurance and private attending physician status (r2 = .39, p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis was subsequently used to control for demographic factors and severity of illness. Three independent predictors for the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions were identified in this patient cohort (p < .05) having a planned therapeutic trial of life-sustaining interventions outlined in the medical record (adjusted odds ratio 9.4; 95% confidence interval = 5.6 to 15.6; p < .001); lack of a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.9 to 6.5; p < .001); and the presence of clearly defined advance directives regarding patient preferences for medical care (adjusted odds ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval = 2.3 to 5.7; p. = .005). Patients with private attending physicians had significantly greater medical care costs and medical care charges compared with patients without a private attending physician. CONCLUSION: Among patients dying within a medical ICU, those patients without a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the active withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the influence of private attending physician status on the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions among patients dying within a medical intensive care unit (ICU). DESIGN: Retrospective cohort analysis. SETTING: An academic tertiary care center. PATIENTS: One hundred fifty-nine consecutive patient deaths occurring in the medical ICU during a 12-month period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions (i.e., mechanical ventilation, dialysis, and/or vasopressors), duration of mechanical ventilation, length of intensive care unit stay, medical care costs, and patient charges were recorded. Life sustaining interventions were actively withdrawn from 69 (43.4%) patients prior to death. Patients without a private attending physician were significantly more likely to undergo the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions compared with patients having a private attending physician (odds ratio = 2.5; 95% confidence interval = 1.8, 3.6, respectively; p = .005). A correlation was found between the possession of private health insurance and private attending physician status (r2 = .39, p < .001). Multiple logistic regression analysis was subsequently used to control for demographic factors and severity of illness. Three independent predictors for the withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions were identified in this patient cohort (p < .05) having a planned therapeutic trial of life-sustaining interventions outlined in the medical record (adjusted odds ratio 9.4; 95% confidence interval = 5.6 to 15.6; p < .001); lack of a private attending physician (adjusted odds ratio = 4.4; 95% confidence interval = 2.9 to 6.5; p < .001); and the presence of clearly defined advance directives regarding patient preferences for medical care (adjusted odds ratio = 3.6; 95% confidence interval = 2.3 to 5.7; p. = .005). Patients with private attending physicians had significantly greater medical care costs and medical care charges compared with patients without a private attending physician. CONCLUSION: Among patients dying within a medical ICU, those patients without a private attending physician are more likely to undergo the active withdrawal of life-sustaining interventions.
Entities:
Keywords:
Death and Euthanasia; Empirical Approach; Health Care and Public Health
Authors: Robert A Fowler; Lori-Anne Noyahr; J Daryl Thornton; Ruxandra Pinto; Jeremy M Kahn; Neill K J Adhikari; Peter M Dodek; Nadia A Khan; Tom Kalb; Andrea Hill; James M O'Brien; David Evans; J Randall Curtis Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2010-05-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Sarah M Lyon; Nicole M Benson; Colin R Cooke; Theodore J Iwashyna; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Jeremy M Kahn Journal: Am J Respir Crit Care Med Date: 2011-10-01 Impact factor: 21.405
Authors: Jessica Ma; Stephen Chi; Benjamin Buettner; Katherine Pollard; Monica Muir; Charu Kolekar; Noor Al-Hammadi; Ling Chen; Marin Kollef; Maria Dans Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2019-12 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Gagan Kumar; Amit Taneja; Tilottama Majumdar; Elizabeth R Jacobs; Jeff Whittle; Rahul Nanchal Journal: Crit Care Med Date: 2014-03 Impact factor: 7.598
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Barbara Metnitz; Charles L Sprung; Jean-François Timsit; François Lemaire; Peter Bauer; Benoît Schlemmer; Rui Moreno; Philipp Metnitz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 17.440