OBJECTIVE: End-of-life decisions are based on objective and subjective criteria. Previous studies identified substantial subjective biases during end-of-life decision-making. We evaluated whether in-ICU patient's birthday influenced management decisions. DESIGN: We used a case-control design in which patients spending their birthday in the ICU (cases) were matched to controls on center, gender, age, severity, type of admission, and length of ICU stay before birthday. SETTING: 12 ICUs in French hospitals. PATIENTS: The cases and controls were patients with ICU admissions >48 h over a 10-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with the 1,042 controls, the 223 cases were more often trauma patients and received a larger number and longer durations of life-sustaining interventions. This increased intensity of life support occurred after, but not before, the birthday. The cases had longer ICU stay lengths. ICU and hospital mortality were not different between the two groups. End-of-life decisions were made in 22% and 24% of cases and controls, respectively. However, these decisions were made later in the cases than in the controls (18 [5-33] versus 9 [3-19] days). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that patients who spent their birthday in the ICU received a higher intensity of life-sustaining care and had longer ICU stays but did not have significantly different mortality rates compared with the controls suggests the use of nonbeneficial interventions. Staff members caring for patients whose birthdays fall during the ICU stay should be aware that this feature can bias end-of-life decisions, leading to an inappropriate level of care.
OBJECTIVE: End-of-life decisions are based on objective and subjective criteria. Previous studies identified substantial subjective biases during end-of-life decision-making. We evaluated whether in-ICU patient's birthday influenced management decisions. DESIGN: We used a case-control design in which patients spending their birthday in the ICU (cases) were matched to controls on center, gender, age, severity, type of admission, and length of ICU stay before birthday. SETTING: 12 ICUs in French hospitals. PATIENTS: The cases and controls were patients with ICU admissions >48 h over a 10-year period. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Compared with the 1,042 controls, the 223 cases were more often traumapatients and received a larger number and longer durations of life-sustaining interventions. This increased intensity of life support occurred after, but not before, the birthday. The cases had longer ICU stay lengths. ICU and hospital mortality were not different between the two groups. End-of-life decisions were made in 22% and 24% of cases and controls, respectively. However, these decisions were made later in the cases than in the controls (18 [5-33] versus 9 [3-19] days). CONCLUSIONS: Our finding that patients who spent their birthday in the ICU received a higher intensity of life-sustaining care and had longer ICU stays but did not have significantly different mortality rates compared with the controls suggests the use of nonbeneficial interventions. Staff members caring for patients whose birthdays fall during the ICU stay should be aware that this feature can bias end-of-life decisions, leading to an inappropriate level of care.
Authors: P J van der Maas; G van der Wal; I Haverkate; C L de Graaff; J G Kester; B D Onwuteaka-Philipsen; A van der Heide; J M Bosma; D L Willems Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 1996-11-28 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Elie Azoulay; Barbara Metnitz; Charles L Sprung; Jean-François Timsit; François Lemaire; Peter Bauer; Benoît Schlemmer; Rui Moreno; Philipp Metnitz Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2008-10-10 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Deborah Cook; Graeme Rocker; John Marshall; Peter Sjokvist; Peter Dodek; Lauren Griffith; Andreas Freitag; Joseph Varon; Christine Bradley; Mitchell Levy; Simon Finfer; Cindy Hamielec; Joseph McMullin; Bruce Weaver; Stephen Walter; Gordon Guyatt Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2003-09-18 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lawrence J Schneiderman; Todd Gilmer; Holly D Teetzel; Daniel O Dugan; Jeffrey Blustein; Ronald Cranford; Kathleen B Briggs; Glen I Komatsu; Paula Goodman-Crews; Felicia Cohn; Ernlé W D Young Journal: JAMA Date: 2003-09-03 Impact factor: 56.272